Cited by 153Pain Management and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Management

Bruehl, Stephen, Chung, Ok Yung·2006·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Psychological and behavioral factors can exacerbate the pain and dysfunction associated with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and could help maintain the condition in some patients. Effective management of CRPS requires that these psychosocial and behavioral aspects be addressed as part of an integrated multidisciplinary treatment approach. Well-controlled studies to guide the development of a psychological approach to CRPS management are not currently available. A sequenced protocol for psychological care in CRPS is therefore proposed based on available data and clinical experience. Regardless of the duration of the condition, all CRPS patients and their families should receive education about the negative effects of disuse, the pathophysiology of the syndrome, and possible interactions with psychological/behavioral factors. Patients with acute CRPS (<6-8 weeks) may not need additional psychological care. All patients with chronic CRPS should receive a thorough psychological evaluation, followed by cognitive-behavioral pain management treatment, including relaxation training with biofeedback. Patients making insufficient overall treatment progress or in whom comorbid psychiatric disorders/major ongoing life stressors are identified should additionally receive general cognitive-behavioral therapy to address these issues. The psychological component of treatment can work synergistically with medical and physical/occupational therapies to improve function and increase patients' ability to manage the condition successfully.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ajp.0000194282.82002.79

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 153

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kurvers, 1998, Partial peripheral neuropathy and denervation induced adrenoceptor supersensitivity, Acta Orthop Belg, 64, 64

Metadata

Authors
Bruehl, S., & Chung, O. Y.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2006-06
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
430-437
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071649200
Cited by
153
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
complex regional pain syndrome, psychological factors in pain, behavioral factors, cognitive-behavioral pain management, biofeedback, relaxation training, psychological assessment, disuse, multidisciplinary treatment, psychiatric comorbidity, life events, treatment protocols
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Health Planning Guidelines, Humans, Review Literature as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review