The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward Efficient and Comprehensive Measurement of the Alcohol Problems Continuum in College Students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire
Abstract
Background: Although a number of measures of alcohol problems in college students have been studied, the psychometric development and validation of these scales have been limited, for the most part, to methods based on classical test theory. In this study, we conducted analyses based on item response theory to select a set of items for measuring the alcohol problem severity continuum in college students that balances comprehensiveness and efficiency and is free from significant gender bias. Method: We conducted Rasch model analyses of responses to the 48‐item Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire by 164 male and 176 female college students who drank on at least a weekly basis. An iterative process using item fit statistics, item severities, item discrimination parameters, model residuals, and analysis of differential item functioning by gender was used to pare the items down to those that best fit a Rasch model and that were most efficient in discriminating among levels of alcohol problems in the sample. Results: The process of iterative Rasch model analyses resulted in a final 24‐item scale with the data fitting the unidimensional Rasch model very well. The scale showed excellent distributional properties, had items adequately matched to the severity of alcohol problems in the sample, covered a full range of problem severity, and appeared highly efficient in retaining all of the meaningful variance captured by the original set of 48 items. Conclusions: The use of Rasch model analyses to inform item selection produced a final scale that, in both its comprehensiveness and its efficiency, should be a useful tool for researchers studying alcohol problems in college students. To aid interpretation of raw scores, examples of the types of alcohol problems that are likely to be experienced across a range of selected scores are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking
White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30 · Cited by 1,693
Andrich, D. (1988) · doi:10.4135/9781412985598 · Cited by 1,345
Cited by
Brown, D. B., Bravo, A. J., Roos, C. R., & Pearson, M. R. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0349-4 · Cited by 178
Impulsivity: Four Ways Five Factors are Not Basic to Addiction
Gullo, M. J., Loxton, N. J., & Dawe, S. (2014) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.002 · Cited by 167
Lewis, M. A., Patrick, M. E., Litt, D. M., Atkins, D. C., Kim, T., Blayney, J. A., Norris, J., George, W. H., & Larimer, M. E. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035550 · Cited by 108
Treeby, M., & Bruno, R. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.011 · Cited by 103
Gunn, R. L., & Smith, G. T. (2010) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0020334 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Read, J. P.
- Venue
- Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1180-1189
- ISSN
- 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0277
- OpenAlex
- W2130072016
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Efficient and Comprehensive Measurement of the Alcohol Problems Continuum in College Students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.alc.0000171940.95813.a5
- The paper
- Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Read, J. P. (2005). Toward Efficient and Comprehensive Measurement of the Alcohol Problems Continuum in College Students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000171940.95813.a5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.