The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Resident Competency in the Management of Shoulder Dystocia With Simulation Training
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a simulation training scenario improves resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia. METHODS: Residents from 2 training programs participated in this study. The residents were block-randomized by year-group to a training session on shoulder dystocia management that used an obstetric birthing simulator or to a control group with no specific training. Trained residents and control subjects were subsequently tested on a standardized shoulder dystocia scenario, and the encounters were digitally recorded. A physician grader from an external institution then graded and rated the resident's performance with a standardized evaluation sheet. Statistical analysis included the Student t test, chi(2), and regression analysis, as appropriate. RESULTS: Trained residents had significantly higher scores in all evaluation categories, including timelines of their interventions, performance of maneuvers, and overall performance. They also performed the delivery in a shorter time than control subjects (61 versus 146 seconds, P =.003). CONCLUSION: Training with a simulation-training scenario improved resident performance in the management of shoulder dystocia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Utility of Simulation in Medical Education: What Is the Evidence?
Okuda, Y., Bryson, E. O., DeMaria, S., Jacobson, L., Quinones, J., Shen, B., & Levine, A. I. (2009) · Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.1002/msj.20127 · Cited by 1,201
Shoulder dystocia: The unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines
Gherman, R. B., Chauhan, S., Ouzounian, J. G., Lerner, H., Gonik, B., & Goodwin, T. M. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007 · Cited by 280
Self-citationSimulation based learning in midwifery education: a systematic review
Cooper, S., Cant, R., Porter, J., Bogossian, F., McKenna, L., Brady, S., & Fox-Young, S. (2012) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2011.03.004 · Cited by 202
The effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care: a systematic literature review.
Ameh, C. A., Mdegela, M., White, S., & van den Broek, N. (2019) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czz028 · Cited by 147
Fransen, A. F., van de Ven, J., Banga, F. R., Mol, B. W. J., & Oei, S. G. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011545.pub2 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Deering, S., Poggi, S., Macedonia, C., Gherman, R., & Satin, A. J.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1224-1228
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985385679
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Resident Competency in the Management of Shoulder Dystocia With Simulation Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000126816.98387.1c
- The paper
- Deering, S., Poggi, S., Macedonia, C., Gherman, R., & Satin, A. J. (2004). Improving Resident Competency in the Management of Shoulder Dystocia With Simulation Training. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000126816.98387.1c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.