The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pregnancy After Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata: The Ontario Multicenter Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report on pregnancies and deliveries occurring in a large cohort of women who underwent uterine artery embolization instead of surgery for symptomatic leiomyomata. METHODS: A total of 555 women underwent uterine embolization in a multicenter clinical trial. The primary embolic agent was 355-500 microm polyvinyl alcohol particles with treatment end-point as bilateral stasis in the uterine arteries. Women desiring pregnancy were informed of the uncertain effect of embolization on fertility and pregnancy. Average age at embolization was 43 years (range 18-59 years). Thirty-one percent were younger than age 40 years. Women were followed up prospectively by telephone, and obstetric records of the women who conceived were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one women of average age 34 years (range 27-42 years) conceived, (3 of these twice), and 13 women were nulliparous. Twenty-three of the 24 pregnancies were conceived spontaneously (1 woman had in vitro fertilization). There were 4 spontaneous abortions (16.7%, 95% confidence interval 5.4-41.9%) and 2 elective pregnancy terminations. Fourteen of the 18 live births were full term and 4 were preterm. There were 9 vaginal deliveries and 9 cesarean deliveries, 4 of which were elective. Abnormal placentation occurred in 3 cases, all nulliparas (12.5% 95% confidence interval 3.1-36.3%). Two cases developed placenta previa (1 had a clinical partial accreta) and the third developed a placenta membranacea with accreta resulting in cesarean hysterectomy. Three postpartum hemorrhages all secondary to placental abnormalities occurred. Four newborns were small for gestational age (< or = 5th percentile); 2 of these pregnancies were complicated by gestational hypertension. CONCLUSION: Women are able to achieve pregnancies after uterine artery embolization, and most resulted in term deliveries and appropriately grown newborns. Close monitoring of placental status, however, is recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery
Klatsky, P. C., Tran, N. D., Caughey, A. B., & Fujimoto, V. Y. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.039 · Cited by 579
Wang, T., Zhang, X., Obijuru, L., Laser, J., Aris, V., Lee, P., Mittal, K., Soteropoulos, P., & Wei, J. (2007) · Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer · doi:10.1002/gcc.20415 · Cited by 257
Campo, S., Campo, V., & Benagiano, G. (2012) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.10.003 · Cited by 158
Teare, J., Evans, E., Belli, A., & Wendler, R. (2014) · International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.11.002 · Cited by 33
Placenta Percreta Presenting with Delayed Haematuria
Wagaskar, V. G. (2015) · JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2015/16411.6935 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pron, G., Mocarski, E., Bennett, J., Vilos, G., Common, A., & Vanderburgh, L.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-76
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172266983
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy After Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata: The Ontario Multicenter Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000149156.07061.1f
- The paper
- Pron, G., Mocarski, E., Bennett, J., Vilos, G., Common, A., & Vanderburgh, L. (2005). Pregnancy After Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomata: The Ontario Multicenter Trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000149156.07061.1f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.