The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness and Safety of Ginger in the Treatment of Pregnancy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conventional antiemetics are burdened with the potential of teratogenic effects during the critical embryogenic period of pregnancy. Thus, a safe and effective medication would be a welcome addition to the therapeutic repertoire. This systematic review was aimed at assessing the evidence for or against the efficacy and safety of ginger (Zingiber officinale) therapy for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature searches were conducted in 3 computerized databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library), and the reference lists of all papers located were checked for further relevant publications. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: For the evaluation of efficacy, only double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. All retrieved clinical data, including uncontrolled trials, case reports, observational studies, and RCTs, were included in the review of safety. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Six double-blind RCTs with a total of 675 participants and a prospective observational cohort study (n = 187) met all inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of 4 of 5 RCTs was high. Four of the 6 RCTs (n = 246) showed superiority of ginger over placebo; the other 2 RCTs (n = 429) indicated that ginger was as effective as the reference drug (vitamin B6) in relieving the severity of nausea and vomiting episodes. The observational study retrieved and RCTs (including follow-up periods) showed the absence of significant side effects or adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes. There were no spontaneous or case reports of adverse events during ginger treatment in pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Ginger may be an effective treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. However, more observational studies, with a larger sample size, are needed to confirm the encouraging preliminary data on ginger safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of ginger on motion sickness and gastric slow-wave dysrhythmias induced by circular vection
Lien, H.-C., Sun, W. M., Chen, Y.-H., Kim, H., Hasler, W., & Owyang, C. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00164.2002 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy
Niebyl, J. R. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1003896 · Cited by 340
Interventions for nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy
Matthews, A., Haas, D. M., O'Mathúna, D. P., & Dowswell, T. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007575.pub4 · Cited by 339
van Tilburg, M. A. L., Palsson, O. S., Ringel, Y., & Whitehead, W. E. (2014) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.015 · Cited by 64
Kean, J., Downey, L., & Stough, C. (2017) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines4040086 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Borrelli, F., Capasso, R., Aviello, G., Pittler, M. H., & Izzo, A. A.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 849-856
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978662954
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness and Safety of Ginger in the Treatment of Pregnancy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000154890.47642.23
- The paper
- Borrelli, F., Capasso, R., Aviello, G., Pittler, M. H., & Izzo, A. A. (2005). Effectiveness and Safety of Ginger in the Treatment of Pregnancy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000154890.47642.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.