The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of Maternal Age on Obstetric Outcome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of maternal age on obstetric outcomes. METHODS: A prospective database from a multicenter investigation of singletons, the FASTER trial, was studied. Subjects were divided into 3 age groups: 1) less than 35 years, 2) 35-39 years, and 3) 40 years and older. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of age on outcomes after adjusting for race, parity, body mass index, education, marital status, smoking, medical history, use of assisted conception, and patient's study site. RESULTS: A total of 36,056 women with complete data were available: 28,398 (79%) less than 35 years of age; 6,294 (17%) 35-39 years; and 1,364 (4%) 40 years and older. Increasing age was significantly associated with miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR]2.0 and 2.4 for ages 35-39 years and age 40 years and older, respectively), chromosomal abnormalities (adjOR 4.0 and 9.9), congenital anomalies (adjOR 1.4 and 1.7), gestational diabetes (adjOR 1.8 and 2.4), placenta previa (adjOR 1.8 and 2.8), and cesarean delivery (adjOR 1.6 and 2.0). Patients aged 35-39 years were at increased risk for macrosomia (adjOR 1.4). Increased risk for abruption (adjOR 2.3), preterm delivery (adjOR 1.4), low birth weight (adjOR 1.6), and perinatal mortality (adjOR 2.2) was noted in women aged 40 years and older. CONCLUSION: Increasing maternal age is independently associated with specific adverse pregnancy outcomes. Increasing age is a continuum rather than a threshold effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Sweeting, A., Wong, J., Murphy, H. R., & Ross, G. P. (2022) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnac003 · Cited by 928
Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lean, S. C., Derricott, H., Jones, R. L., & Heazell, A. E. P. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186287 · Cited by 737
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study
Khalil, A., Syngelaki, A., Maiz, N., Zinevich, Y., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2013) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.12494 · Cited by 439
Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section
Mylonas, I., & Friese, K. (2015) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0489 · Cited by 359
Li, Y., Ren, X., He, L., Li, J., Zhang, S., & Chen, W. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108044 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Cleary-Goldman, J., Malone, F. D., Vidaver, J., Ball, R. H., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Saade, G. R., Eddleman, K. A., Klugman, S., Dugoff, L., Timor-Tritsch, I. E., Craigo, S. D., Carr, S. R., Wolfe, H. M., Bianchi, D. W., & DʼAlton, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5, Part 1
- Pages
- 983-990
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059788501
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Maternal Age on Obstetric Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000158118.75532.51
- The paper
- Cleary-Goldman, J., Malone, F. D., Vidaver, J., Ball, R. H., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Saade, G. R., Eddleman, K. A., Klugman, S., Dugoff, L., Timor-Tritsch, I. E., Craigo, S. D., Carr, S. R., Wolfe, H. M., Bianchi, D. W., & DʼAlton, M. (2005). Impact of Maternal Age on Obstetric Outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000158118.75532.51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.