The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Birth Outcomes in Obese Women After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study sought to examine the outcomes of 79 consecutive first pregnancies (> 20 weeks of gestation) in women following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) for severe obesity. METHODS: The 79 women are from a cohort of 1,382 consecutive patients. The prospectively collected data from 79 first pregnancies has been compared with these patients' previous penultimate pregnancies (n= 40), obstetric histories from matched severely obese subjects (n = 79), and community outcomes. RESULTS: The mean maternal weight gain was 9.6 +/- 9.0 kg, compared with 14.4 +/- 9.7 kg for the 40 penultimate pregnancies of women in this group (P < .001). There was no difference in birth weights: 3,397 g compared with 3,350 g for preband pregnancies, and these were consistent with normal community birth weights. The incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension (10%) and gestational diabetes (6.3%) were comparable with community levels (12% and 5.5%) and lower than the obese cohort (38% and 19%) and these patients' penultimate pregnancies (45% and 15%). Monitoring and, if necessary, band adjustments during pregnancy provided more favorable maternal weight outcomes (P = .027). Neonatal outcomes, including stillbirths, preterm deliveries, low birth weight, and high birth weight, were consistent with community values. One woman developed anemia during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcomes after LAGB are consistent with general community outcomes rather than outcomes from severely obese women. The adjustability of the LAGB assists in achieving these outcomes. Adjustability is appealing because it allows adaptation to the altered requirements of pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fetal and infant origins of adult disease.
Barker, D. J. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1111 · Cited by 2,768
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2003
Buchwald, H., & Williams, S. E. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/0960892042387057 · Cited by 731
Cited by
Pregnancy: a “teachable moment” for weight control and obesity prevention
Phelan, S. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.008 · Cited by 637
Kral, J. G., Biron, S., Simard, S., Hould, F.-S., Lebel, S., Marceau, S., & Marceau, P. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1379 · Cited by 377
Mechanick, J. I., Kushner, R. F., Sugerman, H. J., Gonzalez‐Campoy, J. M., Collazo‐Clavell, M. L., Spitz, A. F., Apovian, C. M., Livingston, E. H., Brolin, R., Sarwer, D. B., et al. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2009.28 · Cited by 345
Self-citationKwong, W., Tomlinson, G., & Feig, D. S. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.003 · Cited by 265
Galazis, N., Docheva, N., Simillis, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2014) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.015 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, J. B., Dixon, M. E., & OʼBrien, P. E.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5, Part 1
- Pages
- 965-972
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1553450629
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birth Outcomes in Obese Women After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000181821.82022.82
- The paper
- Dixon, J. B., Dixon, M. E., & OʼBrien, P. E. (2005). Birth Outcomes in Obese Women After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000181821.82022.82
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.