The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pregnancy Outcome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with an increase in chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, or adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: A prospective database from a large multicenter investigation of singleton pregnancies, the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk trial, was examined. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: no ART use, use of ovulation induction (with or without intrauterine insemination), and use of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess association between ART and adverse pregnancy outcomes (significance of differences was accepted at P < .05). RESULTS: A total of 36,062 pregnancies were analyzed: 34,286 (95.1%) were spontaneously conceived, 1,222 (3.4%) used ovulation induction, and 554 (1.5%) used IVF. There was no association between ART and fetal growth restriction, aneuploidy, or fetal anomalies after adjustment for age, race, marital status, years of education, prior preterm delivery, prior fetal anomaly, body mass index, smoking history, and bleeding in the current pregnancy. Ovulation induction was associated with a statistically significant increase in placental abruption, fetal loss after 24 weeks, and gestational diabetes after adjustment. Use of IVF was associated with a statistically significant increase in preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, placental abruption, placenta previa, and risk of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo IVF are at increased risk for several adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although many of these risks are not seen in patients undergoing ovulation induction, several adverse pregnancy outcomes are still increased in this group. There was no increased incidence of fetal chromosomal or structural abnormalities in the women who used any type of ART compared with the women who conceived spontaneously. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta–analysis
Jackson, R. A., Gibson, K. A., Wu, Y. W., & Croughan, M. S. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000114989.84822.51 · Cited by 1,160
The Risk of Major Birth Defects after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and in Vitro Fertilization
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Bower, C., & Webb, S. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010035 · Cited by 1,083
Low and Very Low Birth Weight in Infants Conceived with Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology
Schieve, L. A., Meikle, S. F., Ferre, C., Peterson, H. B., Jeng, G., & Wilcox, L. S. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010806 · Cited by 1,017
Bergh, T., Ericson, A., Hillensjö, T., Nygren, K.-G., & Wennerholm, U.-B. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04345-7 · Cited by 660
Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study
Strömberg, B., Dahlquist, G., Ericson, A., Finnström, O., Köster, M., & Stjernqvist, K. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07674-2 · Cited by 536
Bonduelle, M., Liebaers, I., Deketelaere, V., Derde, M.-P., Camus, M., Devroey, P., & Van Steirteghem, A. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.3.671 · Cited by 531
Obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization pregnancies compared with normally conceived pregnancies
Tan, S.-L., Doyle, P., Campbell, S., Beral, V., Rizk, B., Brinsden, P., Mason, B., & Edwards, R. G. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91589-0 · Cited by 261
Draper, E. S., Kurinczuk, J. J., Abrams, K. R., & Clarke, M. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08500-6 · Cited by 170
Surgically obtained sperm, and risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia
Wang, J. X., Knottnerus, A.-M., Schuit, G., Norman, R. J., Chan, A., & Dekker, G. A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07804-2 · Cited by 167
Schieve, L. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Louis, G. M. B., Schendel, D., Reynolds, M. A., & Wright, V. C. (2004) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000124571.04890.67 · Cited by 154
Cited by
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flenady, V., Koopmans, L., Middleton, P., Frøen, J. F., Smith, G. C., Gibbons, K., Coory, M., Gordon, A., Ellwood, D., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7 · Cited by 1,247
Bartsch, E., Medcalf, K. E., Park, A. L., & Ray, J. G. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i1753 · Cited by 996
McDonald, S. D., Han, Z., Mulla, S., Murphy, K. E., Beyene, J., & Ohlsson, A. (2009) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.035 · Cited by 435
Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J. J., Milne, E., de Klerk, N., & Bower, C. (2013) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmt006 · Cited by 384
Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age
Luke, B., & Brown, M. B. (2007) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/del522 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Shevell, T., Malone, F. D., Vidaver, J., Porter, T. F., Luthy, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Hankins, G. D., Eddleman, K., Dolan, S., Dugoff, L., Craigo, S., Timor, I. E., Carr, S. R., Wolfe, H. M., Bianchi, D. W., & D’Alton, M. E.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5, Part 1
- Pages
- 1039-1045
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109896183
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pregnancy Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000183593.24583.7c
- The paper
- Shevell, T., Malone, F. D., Vidaver, J., Porter, T. F., Luthy, D. A., Comstock, C. H., Hankins, G. D., Eddleman, K., Dolan, S., Dugoff, L., Craigo, S., Timor, I. E., Carr, S. R., Wolfe, H. M., Bianchi, D. W., & D’Alton, M. E. (2005). Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pregnancy Outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000183593.24583.7c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.