The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-Based Strategies for Implementing Guidelines in Obstetrics: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate effective strategies for implementing clinical practice guidelines in obstetric care and to identify specific barriers to behavior change and facilitators in obstetrics. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were consulted from January 1990 to June 2005. Additional studies were identified by screening reference lists from identified studies and experts' suggestions. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies of clinical practice guidelines implementation strategies in obstetric care and reviews of such studies were selected. Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were evaluated according to Effective Practice and Organization of Care criteria standards. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were reviewed by two investigators to assess the quality and the efficacy of each strategy. Discordances between the two reviewers were resolved by consensus. In obstetrics, educational strategies with medical providers are generally ineffective; educational strategies with paramedical providers, opinion leaders, qualitative improvement, and academic detailing have mixed effects; audit and feedback, reminders, and multifaceted strategies are generally effective. These findings differ from data on the efficacy of clinical practice guidelines implementation strategies in other medical specialties. Specific barriers to behavior change in obstetrics and methods to overcome these barriers could explain these differences. The proportion of effective strategies is significantly higher among the interventions that include a prospective identification of barriers to change compared with standardized interventions. CONCLUSION: Prospective identification of efficient strategies and barriers to change is necessary to achieve a better adaptation of intervention and to improve clinical practice guidelines implementation. In the field of obstetric care, multifaceted strategy based on audit and feedback and facilitated by local opinion leaders is recommended to effectively change behaviors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although there are a number of reviews in specific clinical fields (Chaillet 2006; Kroenke 2000), which have discussed the possibility that tailored strategies might be more effective than strategies selected without taking account of determinants, these reviews did not address the effect or costs of tailored interventions specifically.”
From Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice (2015) · cites this paper as Chaillet 2006
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations
Grimshaw, J., & Russell, I. T. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n · Cited by 2,791
Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.7.3.149 · Cited by 1,985
Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT)
Kramer, M. S., CHALMERS, B. E., HODNETT, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shapiro, S. H., Collet, J., Vanilovich, I., Mezen, I., Ducruet, T., et al. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.4.413 · Cited by 1,536
Do Practice Guidelines Guide Practice?
Lomas, J., Anderson, G. M., Pierre, K. D., Vayda, E., Enkin, M. W., & Hannah, W. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198911093211906 · Cited by 1,231
(1997) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,226
How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?
Rowe, A. K., de Savigny, D., Lanata, C. F., & Victora, C. G. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67028-6 · Cited by 1,048
Principles of Educational Outreach ('Academic Detailing') to Improve Clinical Decision Making
Soumerai, S. B. (1990) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440040088034 · Cited by 1,045
Opinion Leaders vs Audit and Feedback to Implement Practice Guidelines
Lomas, J. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.265.17.2202 · Cited by 744
Shortell, S. M., Bennett, C. L., & Byck, G. R. (1998) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00107 · Cited by 646
WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care
Villar, J., Ba'aqeel, H., Piaggio, G., Lumbiganon, P., Belizán, J. M., Farnot, U., Al-Mazrou, Y., Carroli, G., Pinol, A., Donner, A., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04722-x · Cited by 627
Fear of childbirth: a neglected dilemma
Saisto, T., & Halmesmäki, E. (2003) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00114.x · Cited by 461
Chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how much benefit is enough?
Grilli, R. G., Oxman, A. D., & Julian, J. A. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.10.1866 · Cited by 382
Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.
Mugford, M., Banfield, P., & O'Hanlon, M. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.303.6799.398 · Cited by 333
A Clinical Trial of Active Management of Labor
Frigoletto, F. D., Lieberman, E., Lang, J. M., Cohen, A., Barss, V. A., Ringer, S. A., & Datta, S. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199509213331201 · Cited by 295
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes
Grimshaw, J. (2003) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qhc.12.4.298 · Cited by 290
A Controlled Trial of a Program for the Active Management of Labor
López-Zeno, J. A., Peaceman, A. M., Adashek, J. A., & Socol, M. L. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199202133260705 · Cited by 261
Patient Choice Cesarean: An Evidence-Based Review
Wax, J. R., Cartin, A., Pinette, M. G., & Blackstone, J. A. (2004) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57 · Cited by 222
Althabe, F., Belizán, J. M., Villar, J., Alexander, S., Bergel, E. F., Ramos, S., Romero, M., Donner, A. P., Lindmark, G., Langer, A., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16406-4 · Cited by 187
Lactation Counseling Increases Exclusive Breast-Feeding Rates in Ghana
Aidam, B. A., Pérez‐Escamilla, R., & Lartey, A. A. (2005) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/135.7.1691 · Cited by 153
Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates
Robson, M. S., Scudamore, I., & Walsh, S. M. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70394-0 · Cited by 142
Homer, C. S. E., Davis, G. K., Brodie, P. M., Sheehan, A., Barclay, L. M., Wills, J., & Chapman, M. G. (2001) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00022.x · Cited by 130
Leviton, L. C., Goldenberg, R. L., Baker, C. S., Schwartz, R. M., Freda, M. C., Fish, L. J., Cliver, S. P., Rouse, D. J., Chazotte, C., Merkatz, I. R., et al. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.1.46 · Cited by 128
Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units
Wyatt, J. C., Paterson-Brown, S., Johanson, R., Altman, D. G., Bradburn, M. J., & Fisk, N. M. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1041 · Cited by 114
A systematic review of training in acute obstetric emergencies
Black, R., & Brocklehurst, P. S. (2003) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02488.x · Cited by 108
Childbirth Preferences after Cesarean Birth: A Review of the Evidence
Eden, K., Hashima, J., Osterweil, P., Nygren, P., & Guise, J. (2004) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0274.x · Cited by 108
Windsor, R. A., Woodby, L. L., Miller, T. M., Hardin, J. M., Crawford, M. A., & DiClemente, C. C. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70492-3 · Cited by 108
Fraser, W. D., Maunsell, E., HODNETT, E. D., & Moutquin, J. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70509-x · Cited by 103
Self-citationReducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital
Socol, M. L., Garcia, P. M., Peaceman, A. M., & Dooley, S. L. (1993) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(93)90686-d · Cited by 91
Lagrew, D. C., & Morgan, M. A. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70392-7 · Cited by 90
Weinberg, M. S., Fuentes, J. M., Ruiz, A. I., Lozano, F. W., Ángel, E., Gaitán, H., Goethe, B., Parra, S., Hellerstein, S. C., Ross‐Degnan, D., et al. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.19.2357 · Cited by 86
Critical companionship: part 1
Titchen, A. (2003) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns2003.11.18.9.33.c3502 · Cited by 84
Dumont, A. (2006) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.05.023903 · Cited by 81
Self-citationSome limits to evidence-based medicine: a case study from elective orthopaedics.
Ferlie, E. B., Wood, M., & Fitzgerald, L. (1999) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.8.2.99 · Cited by 80
Nígenda, G., Langer, A., Kuchaisit, C., Romero, M., Rojas, G., Al-Osimy, M. H., Villar, J., Garcia, J., Al-Mazrou, Y. Y., Ba’aqeel, H., et al. (2003) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-3-17 · Cited by 78
Quinlivan, J. A., Petersen, R. W., & Nichols, C. N. (1999) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03375.x · Cited by 76
Getting guidelines into practice: a literature review
Richens, Y., Anderson, E. G., Rycroft-Malone, J., & Morrell, C. (2004) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns2004.08.18.50.33.c3677 · Cited by 76
Reducing Risk by Improving Standards of Intrapartum Fetal Care
Young, P., Hamilton, R., Hodgett, S., Moss, M. C., Rigby, C., Jones, P., & Johanson, R. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107680109400507 · Cited by 73
Reducing Cesarean Birth Rates With Data-driven Quality Improvement Activities
Main, E. K. (1999) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.103.se1.374 · Cited by 64
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Davies, B., & Nimrod, C. A. (2004) · Birth · doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00322.x · Cited by 54
Foy, R., Penney, G. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Ramsay, C. R., Walker, A. E., MacLennan, G., Stearns, S. C., McKenzie, L., & Glasier, A. (2004) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00168.x · Cited by 44
Effect of Departmental Policies on Cesarean Delivery Rates: A Community Hospital Experience
Poma, P. A. (1998) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00077-5 · Cited by 44
The employment of ward opinion leaders for continuing education in the hospital
Hong, S. W., Ching, T. Y., Fwng, J. P. M., & Seto, W. (1990) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/01421599009006698 · Cited by 37
Monitoring obstetric services: putting the ‘UN Guidelines’ into practice in Malawi: 3 years on
Hussein, J., Goodburn, E., Damisoni, H., Lema, V. M., & Graham, W. J. (2001) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00474-x · Cited by 37
Davies, B., HODNETT, E. D., Hannah, M., O’Brien‐Pallas, L., Pringle, D. M., & Wells, G. (2002) · PubMed Central · Cited by 33
Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.
Iglesias, S., Burn, R., & Saunders, L. D. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 31
The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: An update after 6 years
Myers, S. A., & Gleicher, N. (1993) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90333-y · Cited by 31
Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: A statewide program
Bickell, N. A., Zdeb, M. S., Applegate, M. S., Roohan, P. R., & Siu, A. L. (1996) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00024-5 · Cited by 29
Williams, A., Adams, E. J., Bolderson, J., Tincello, D. G., & RICHMOND, D. H. (2003) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-003-1091-y · Cited by 24
Effect of peer review and trial of labor on lowering cesarean section rates.
Liang, W., Yuan, C. C., Hung, J., Yang, M. L., Yang, M. J., Chen, Y. J., & Yang, T. S. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 23
Sisk, J. E., Greer, A. L., Wojtowycz, M., Pincus, L. B., & Aubry, R. H. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.014 · Cited by 23
The impact of guidelines on mild hypertension in pregnancy: time series analysis
Foy, R., Ramsay, C. R., Grimshaw, J., Penney, G. C., Vale, L. D., Thomson, A. L., & Greer, I. A. (2004) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00212.x · Cited by 19
Influence of audit and feedback on use of caesarean section in a geographically-defined population
Kiwanuka, A., & Moore, W. M. (1993) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/0028-2243(93)90165-9 · Cited by 16
The Effect of Computer-Assisted Evaluation of Labor on Cesarean Rates
Hamilton, E., Platt, R. W., Gauthier, R., McNamara, H., Miner, L., Rothenberg, S., Asselin, G., Sabbah, R., Benjamin, A., Lake, M. F., et al. (2004) · Journal for Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2004.tb00470.x · Cited by 14
A Successful Program to Reduce Cesarean Section Rates: Friendly Persuasion
Myers, S. A., & Gleicher, N. (1991) · QRB - Quality Review Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30447-x · Cited by 11
Vincent-Boulétreau, A., Caillat-Vallet, E., Dumas, A.-M., Ayzac, L., Chapuis, C., Emery, M.-N., Girard, R., Haond, C., Lafarge-Leboucher, J., Tissot-Guerraz, F., et al. (2005) · Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément/Journal de gynécologie obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction · doi:10.1016/s0368-2315(05)82704-8 · Cited by 10
Mousa, H., & Mahmood, T. A. (2000) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.0790121086.x · Cited by 9
Improving the standards of care for women having caesarean sections
Muthukumarappan, C. R. K. (2000) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443610020001387 · Cited by 6
Utilizing Best Practice Methods to Improve Labour Management in a Partnership of Five Hospitals
Walker, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30345-0 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Davis, 1997, CMAJ, 157, 408
- Richens, 2004, Nursing Standard, 18, 33, 10.7748/ns.18.50.33.s52 · DOI
- Ronsmans, 2001, Stud HSO P, 17, 207
- Lomas, 1991, JAMA, 265, 2202, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460170056033 · DOI
- Davies, 2002, CMAJ, 167, 469
- Homer, 2001, BJOG, 108, 16
- Liang, 2004, J Chin Med Assoc, 67, 281
- Mousa, 2000, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 79, 1086
- Taylor, 2000, Health Bull (Edinb), 58, 38
- Iglesias, 1991, CMAJ, 145, 1459
- Poma, 1998, Obstet Gynecol, 91, 1013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Francke, A. L., Smit, M. C., de Veer, A. J. E., & Mistiaen, P. (2008) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-38 · Cited by 1,183
A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health
Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., Glass, J. E., & York, J. L. (2012) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558711430690 · Cited by 1,069
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E. J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., & Robertson, N. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub2 · Cited by 1,003
Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice
Institute of Medicine (2009) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12598 · Cited by 835
Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E. J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., Robertson, N., Wensing, M., Fiander, M., Eccles, M. P., et al. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub3 · Cited by 711
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaillet, N., Dubé, E., Dugas, M., Audibert, F., Tourigny, C., Fraser, W. D., & Dumont, A.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1234-1245
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021456087
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- guideline implementation, obstetric care, barriers to behavior change, audit and feedback, opinion leaders, academic detailing, multicomponent intervention, educational intervention, reminders, health care provider behavior
- MeSH terms
- Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Obstetrics, Professional Practice, Quality of Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review