The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines for Women With Normal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with normal prepregnancy body mass index. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of women with normal prepregnancy body mass index who delivered full-term singletons using Missouri birth certificate data for 1999-2001. The cohort was divided into three groups (less than recommended [less than 25 lb], n=16,852; recommended [25-35 lb], n=37,292; more than recommended [more than 35 lb], n=40,552) based on Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines. Logistic regression was used to adjust for known confounders. RESULTS: Compared with women gaining 25-35 lb, women gaining less than 25 lb during pregnancy had lower odds for preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.64), cephalopelvic disproportion (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.75), failed induction (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78), cesarean delivery (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.87), and large for gestational age infants (aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.37-0.44) and increased odds for small for gestational age infants (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 2.01-2.27). Likewise, women gaining more than 35 lb had lower odds for small for gestational age infants (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.45-0.50) and increased odds for preeclampsia (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.74-2.04), failed induction (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.39-1.64), cesarean delivery (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.29-1.40), and large for gestational age infants (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 2.30-2.56). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that adherence to the current Institute of Medicine guidelines results in lower risks for adverse pregnancy, labor, and delivery outcomes when comparing all outcomes collectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population
Wyatt, P. R., Owolabi, T., Meier, C., & Huang, T. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.099 · Cited by 114
Cited by
Siega-Riz, A. M., Viswanathan, M., Moos, M.-K., Deierlein, A., Mumford, S., Knaack, J., Thieda, P., Lux, L. J., & Lohr, K. N. (2009) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.002 · Cited by 708
The effect of gestational weight gain by body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes
Crane, J. M. G., White, J., Murphy, P., Burrage, L., & Hutchens, D. (2009) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34050-6 · Cited by 363
Predicting adverse obstetric outcome after early pregnancy events and complications: a review
van Oppenraaij, R. H. F., Jauniaux, E., Christiansen, O. B., Horcajadas, J. A., Farquharson, R. G., Exalto, N., & on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for Early Pregnancy (SIGEP) (2009) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp009 · Cited by 159
Nohr, E. A., Vaeth, M., Baker, J. L., Sørensen, T. I., Olsen, J., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27919 · Cited by 128
Hartling, L., Bond, K., Santaguida, P. L., Viswanathan, M., & Dryden, D. M. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.010 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- DeVader, S. R., Neeley, H. L., Myles, T. D., & Leet, T. L.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 745-751
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320186162
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines for Women With Normal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aog.0000284451.37882.85
- The paper
- DeVader, S. R., Neeley, H. L., Myles, T. D., & Leet, T. L. (2007). Evaluation of Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines for Women With Normal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000284451.37882.85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.