The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Adherence to Birth Control Pills Among College Women [229]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive pills (OCP) are the most commonly used method of birth control among college women. Those who vary from the prescribed directions have a risk of contraceptive failure up to 9%. METHODS: Between April and December 2014, a one-time written survey was administered in a university women's health clinic. Key questions addressed the students' OCP regimen and variables often encountered by college women which could affect adherence to an OCP regimen. RESULTS: One hundred seventy completed surveys were collected. Data indicated that 89% of surveyed women were educated on the importance of maintaining a strict OCP-taking regimen. However, 73.5% did not take the pill at the same time daily; 52% of respondents skipped at least one dose of the pill within the month preceding the survey; and of these women, 19% skipped two or more doses. Over half of surveyed women indicated that they have been concerned about becoming pregnant while on the pill. Additionally, approximately 22% used emergency post-coital contraception while on OCPs. CONCLUSION: Variance from perfect use of OCPs is common among college women. The use of contraceptive methods that do not require such strict compliance should be offered to women in this population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nonadherence to oral contraceptives is common.
“(2) nonadherence to oral contraceptives is common [28,29]”
From Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study
Corbett, C. F., Combs, E. M., Chandarana, P. S., Stringfellow, I., Worthy, K., Nguyen, T., Wright, P. J., & O'Kane, J. M. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/27327 · Cited by 14
“We selected this population because (1) younger adults are likely to have more technological literacy than middle-aged or older adults and therefore may provide higher quality feedback about the skill with minimal frustration if it does not work as expected, (2) nonadherence to oral contraceptives is common [28,29], a…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiltjer, C. A., Duff, P., Williams, K., & Shuster, J. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- 74S
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080157960
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Keywords
- oral contraceptives, contraceptive adherence, female university students, missed doses, contraceptive failure, emergency contraception, pregnancy concerns, contraceptive choice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review