Cited by 3Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring Adherence to Birth Control Pills Among College Women [229]

Wiltjer, Chelsea Amanda, Duff, Patrick, Williams, Karen, Shuster, Jonathan J.·2015·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral contraceptive pills (OCP) are the most commonly used method of birth control among college women. Those who vary from the prescribed directions have a risk of contraceptive failure up to 9%. METHODS: Between April and December 2014, a one-time written survey was administered in a university women's health clinic. Key questions addressed the students' OCP regimen and variables often encountered by college women which could affect adherence to an OCP regimen. RESULTS: One hundred seventy completed surveys were collected. Data indicated that 89% of surveyed women were educated on the importance of maintaining a strict OCP-taking regimen. However, 73.5% did not take the pill at the same time daily; 52% of respondents skipped at least one dose of the pill within the month preceding the survey; and of these women, 19% skipped two or more doses. Over half of surveyed women indicated that they have been concerned about becoming pregnant while on the pill. Additionally, approximately 22% used emergency post-coital contraception while on OCPs. CONCLUSION: Variance from perfect use of OCPs is common among college women. The use of contraceptive methods that do not require such strict compliance should be offered to women in this population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000463154.89957.a3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Medication Adherence Reminder System for Virtual Home Assistants: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study

    Corbett, C. F., Combs, E. M., Chandarana, P. S., Stringfellow, I., Worthy, K., Nguyen, T., Wright, P. J., & O'Kane, J. M. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/27327 · Cited by 14

    “We selected this population because (1) younger adults are likely to have more technological literacy than middle-aged or older adults and therefore may provide higher quality feedback about the skill with minimal frustration if it does not work as expected, (2) nonadherence to oral contraceptives is common [28,29], a…”
    Method

Metadata

Authors
Wiltjer, C. A., Duff, P., Williams, K., & Shuster, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2015-05
Volume
125
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
74S
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080157960
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
oral contraceptives, contraceptive adherence, female university students, missed doses, contraceptive failure, emergency contraception, pregnancy concerns, contraceptive choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review