Cited by 2Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsInnovations in Medical EducationMaternal and fetal healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Rural Obstetrical Ultrasound Triage Exam (ROUTE): Teaching Health Care Workers in International Settings [392]

Sanchez, Olivia, Baker, Jessa, Vaughan, Jessica, Steller, Jonathan Glenn, Toohey, Julianne S.·2015·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of training inexperienced rural healthcare workers to use the Rural Obstetrical Ultrasound Triage Exam (ROUTE). The ROUTE is a diagnostic algorithm using portable ultrasound in rural areas to triage patients for future risk of maternal or fetal complications. METHODS: Participant attitude and experience in obstetrical ultrasound (OB-US) was assessed using a twenty-item survey pre-and post-course. Medical students who completed a yearlong ultrasound program and twelve hours of OB-US training, taught participants two-hours of basic ultrasound and the ROUTE with six hours of hands-on training. Participants then performed ROUTE scans on patients. Practical skills were compared to trained student controls. RESULTS: OB-US knowledge improved from a pre-course average of 31.31% to 70.71% (n=12) correct post-course; a two-tailed paired t-test comparing tests was significant (P=.0002). In all surveys, participants identified OB-US as “safe” and the technology as useful to their healthcare practice. Participants assessed fetal number (n=26) and fetal presentation (n=10) on 100% of scans (0% error). Placenta previa (n=25) and oligohydramnios/polyhydramnios (n=8) were correctly ruled out on 100% of scans (0% error). On average, participants correctly dated pregnancies based on CRL (n=7) 57.1% of the time, and BPD (n=10) 61.1% of the time (<7% error) compared to controls. CONCLUSION: This pilot study found that with medical student-led ROUTE training, it is possible to teach rural healthcare workers how to successfully perform many important aspects of the ROUTE. Additionally, these results highlight a need for more robust training for accurate fetal dating.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.aog.0000463214.16868.eb

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Sanchez, O., Baker, J., Vaughan, J., Steller, J. G., & Toohey, J. S.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2015-05
Volume
125
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
122S
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329729016
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, ultrasound training, medical students, portable ultrasound, maternal and fetal complications, triage, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, fetal presentation, gestational age estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review