The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Rural Obstetrical Ultrasound Triage Exam (ROUTE): Teaching Health Care Workers in International Settings [392]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of training inexperienced rural healthcare workers to use the Rural Obstetrical Ultrasound Triage Exam (ROUTE). The ROUTE is a diagnostic algorithm using portable ultrasound in rural areas to triage patients for future risk of maternal or fetal complications. METHODS: Participant attitude and experience in obstetrical ultrasound (OB-US) was assessed using a twenty-item survey pre-and post-course. Medical students who completed a yearlong ultrasound program and twelve hours of OB-US training, taught participants two-hours of basic ultrasound and the ROUTE with six hours of hands-on training. Participants then performed ROUTE scans on patients. Practical skills were compared to trained student controls. RESULTS: OB-US knowledge improved from a pre-course average of 31.31% to 70.71% (n=12) correct post-course; a two-tailed paired t-test comparing tests was significant (P=.0002). In all surveys, participants identified OB-US as “safe” and the technology as useful to their healthcare practice. Participants assessed fetal number (n=26) and fetal presentation (n=10) on 100% of scans (0% error). Placenta previa (n=25) and oligohydramnios/polyhydramnios (n=8) were correctly ruled out on 100% of scans (0% error). On average, participants correctly dated pregnancies based on CRL (n=7) 57.1% of the time, and BPD (n=10) 61.1% of the time (<7% error) compared to controls. CONCLUSION: This pilot study found that with medical student-led ROUTE training, it is possible to teach rural healthcare workers how to successfully perform many important aspects of the ROUTE. Additionally, these results highlight a need for more robust training for accurate fetal dating.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In an attempt to overcome such challenges, ultrasound training programs have taught non-experts either to independently perform obstetric ultrasounds to screen for high-risk pregnancies (52–55) or to utilize tele-ultrasound (29, 34, 37, 38).”
From Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tele-Ultrasound in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review
Britton, N., Miller, M. A., Safadi, S., Siegel, A., Levine, A. R., & McCurdy, M. T. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00244 · Cited by 166
Vyas, A., Moran, K., Livingston, J. K., et al. (2018) · World Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2018.03.009 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanchez, O., Baker, J., Vaughan, J., Steller, J. G., & Toohey, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- ORCID
- Baker, Jessa
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- 122S
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329729016
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Keywords
- prenatal ultrasound, ultrasound training, medical students, portable ultrasound, maternal and fetal complications, triage, placenta previa, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, fetal presentation, gestational age estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review