Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 480

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lymphatic Neoangiogenesis in Human Kidney Transplants Is Associated with Immunologically Active Lymphocytic Infiltrates

Kerjaschki, Dontscho, Regele, Heinrich M., Moosberger, Isabella, Nagy-Bojarski, Katalyn, Watschinger, Bruno, Soleiman, Afschin, Birner, Peter, Krieger, Sigurd, Hovorka, Anny, Silberhumer, Georg, Laakkonen, Pirjo, Petrova, Tatiana, Langer, Brigitte, Raab, Ingrid·2004·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Renal transplant rejection is caused by a lymphocyte-rich inflammatory infiltrate that attacks cortical tubules and endothelial cells. Immunosuppressive therapy reduces the number of infiltrating cells; however, their exit routes are not known. Here a >50-fold increase of lymphatic vessel density over normal kidneys in grafts with nodular mononuclear infiltrates is demonstrated by immunohistochemistry on human renal transplant biopsies using antibodies to the lymphatic endothelial marker protein podoplanin. Nodular infiltrates are constantly associated with newly formed, Ki-67-expressing lymphatic vessels and contain the entire repertoire of T and B lymphocytes to provide specific cellular and humoral alloantigenic immune responses, including Ki-67(+) CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes, S100(+) dendritic cells, and Ki-67(+)CD20(+) B lymphocytes and lambda- and kappa-chain-expressing plasmacytoid cells. Numerous chemokine receptor CCR7(+) cells within the nodular infiltrates seemed to be attracted by secondary lymphatic chemokine (SLC/CCL21) that is produced and released by lymphatic endothelial cells in a complex with podoplanin. From these results, it is speculated that lymphatic neoangiogenesis not only contributes to the export of the rejection infiltrate but also is involved in the maintenance of a potentially detrimental alloreactive immune response in renal transplants and provides a novel therapeutic target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.asn.0000113316.52371.2e

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 480

Metadata

Authors
Kerjaschki, D., Regele, H. M., Moosberger, I., Nagy-Bojarski, K., Watschinger, B., Soleiman, A., Birner, P., Krieger, S., Hovorka, A., Silberhumer, G., Laakkonen, P., Petrova, T., Langer, B., & Raab, I.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2004-03
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
603-612
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123308947
Cited by
480
References
0
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lymphatic Neoangiogenesis in Human Kidney Transplants Is Associated with Immunologically Active Lymphocytic Infiltrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.asn.0000113316.52371.2e
The paper
Kerjaschki, D., Regele, H. M., Moosberger, I., Nagy-Bojarski, K., Watschinger, B., Soleiman, A., Birner, P., Krieger, S., Hovorka, A., Silberhumer, G., Laakkonen, P., Petrova, T., Langer, B., & Raab, I. (2004). Lymphatic Neoangiogenesis in Human Kidney Transplants Is Associated with Immunologically Active Lymphocytic Infiltrates. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asn.0000113316.52371.2e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.