Continuum of Renoprotection with Losartan at All Stages of Type 2 Diabetic Nephropathy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the RENAAL Trial Results
Abstract
Renin angiotensin system inhibitor therapy is seldom offered to individuals who have diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease because of safety concerns. In this post hoc, secondary analysis of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial, angiotensin antagonism risk/benefit profile was assessed in 1513 individuals with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Incidence of ESRD, hospitalizations for heart failure, withdrawals for adverse events, and proteinuria during losartan or conventional treatment were compared within three tertiles of baseline serum creatinine concentration (highest, 2.1 to 3.6 mg/dl; middle, 1.6 to 2.0 mg/dl; lowest, 0.9 to 1.6 mg/dl). Losartan decreased the risk of ESRD by 24.6, 26.3, and 35.3% in highest, middle, and lowest tertiles, respectively. For every 100 patients with serum creatinine >2.0, 1.6 to 2.0, or <1.6 mg/dl, respectively, 4 yr of losartan therapy was estimated to save 18.9, 8.4, and 2.9 ESRD events and US$1,502,855, US$1,021,770, and US$528,591 costs for renal replacement therapy. Losartan also decreased the hospitalizations for heart failure by 50.2 and 45.1, in the highest and middle tertile, respectively. Withdrawals for adverse events other than heart failure were comparable between tertiles and treatment groups. Proteinuria decreased more on losartan than on placebo in all tertiles (highest, 24 versus -8%; middle, 16 versus -8%; lowest, 15 versus -10%). In proteinuric individual…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were suggestions in clinical trials that the greatest slowing of kidney disease progression occurred in patients with the lowest eGFR at study initiation.
“there were suggestions in clinical trials that the greatest slowing of kidney disease progression occurred in patients with the lowest eGFR at study initiation. 33,62”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Remuzzi, G., Ruggenenti, P., Perna, A., Dimitrov, B. D., de Zeeuw, D., Hille, D. A., Shahinfar, S., Carides, G. W., & Brenner, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3117-3125
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104266516
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
- Keywords
- losartan, type 2 diabetic nephropathy, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, end-stage renal disease, heart failure hospitalization, proteinuria, serum creatinine, renal function, RENAAL trial
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Cost Savings, Health Care Costs, Losartan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review