The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Six Radiographic Projections to Assess Femoral Head/Neck Asphericity
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Early radiographic detection of femoroacetabular impingement might prevent initiation and progression of osteoarthritis. The structural abnormality in femoral-induced femoroacetabular impingement (cam type) is frequently asphericity at the anterosuperior head/neck contour. To determine which of six radiographic projections (anteroposterior, Dunn, Dunn/45 degrees flexion, cross-table/15 degrees internal rotation, cross-table/neutral rotation, and cross-table/15 degrees external rotation) best identifies femoral head/neck asphericity, we studied 21 desiccated femurs; 11 with an aspherical femoral head/neck contour and 10 with a spherical femoral head/neck contour. To radiographically quantify femoral head asphericity, we measured the angle where the femoral head/neck leaves sphericity (angle alpha). The aspherical femoral head/neck contours had a greater maximum angle alpha (70 degrees ) compared with the spherical head/neck contours (50 degrees ). The angle alpha varied depending on the radiographic projection: it was greatest in the Dunn view with 45 degrees hip flexion (71 degrees +/- 10 degrees ) and least in the cross-table view in 15 degrees external rotation (51 degrees +/- 7 degrees ). Diagnosis of a pathologic femoral head/neck contour depends on the radiologic projection. The Dunn view in 45 degrees or 90 degrees flexion or a cross-table projection in internal rotation best show femoral head/neck asphericity, whereas anteroposterior or externally rotated cross-table views are likely to miss asphericity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II-1 (retrospective study).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Etiology of Osteoarthritis of the Hip: An Integrated Mechanical Concept
Ganz, R., Leunig, M., Leunig-Ganz, K., & Harris, W. H. (2008) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z · Cited by 1,620
Self-citationA Systematic Approach to the Plain Radiographic Evaluation of the Young Adult Hip
Clohisy, J. C., Carlisle, J. C., Beaulé, P. E., Kim, Y.-J., Trousdale, R. T., Sierra, R. J., Leunig, M., Schoenecker, P. L., & Millis, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.00756 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationFemoroacetabular Impingement: Radiographic Diagnosis—What the Radiologist Should Know
Tannast, M., Siebenrock, K. A., & Anderson, S. E. (2007) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.06.0921 · Cited by 1,020
Prevalence of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology in Asymptomatic Volunteers
Hack, K., Di Primio, G., Rakhra, K., & Beaulé, P. E. (2010) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01280 · Cited by 512
The Concept of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Leunig, M., Beaulé, P. E., & Ganz, R. (2009) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0646-0 · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, D. C., Beck, M., Ellis, T., Ganz, R., & Leunig, M.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 445
- Pages
- 181-185
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017547682
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Six Radiographic Projections to Assess Femoral Head/Neck Asphericity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000201168.72388.24
- The paper
- Meyer, D. C., Beck, M., Ellis, T., Ganz, R., & Leunig, M. (2006). Comparison of Six Radiographic Projections to Assess Femoral Head/Neck Asphericity. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000201168.72388.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.