The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Satisfaction with the outcome of total knee arthroplasty is highly variable, with a small but significant percentage of patients reporting dissatisfaction with the procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors contribute to patient satisfaction with total knee replacement (TKR), and their relative importance. At a minimum of 1 year post unilateral primary TKR, 253 patients completed a self-administered, validated "Knee Function Questionnaire," which examined each patient's participation in a broad range of activities involving the knee, their level of satisfaction, and the extent to which TKR had fulfilled their expectations. The association between function, expectation and satisfaction was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Seventy-five percent of patients were either "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their knee replacement, while 14% were "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied." Satisfaction correlated significantly (p < 0.001) with age less than 60, absence of residual symptoms, fulfillment of expectations, and absence of functional impairment. Satisfaction with TKR is primarily determined by patients' expectations, and not their absolute level of function. Real improvements in the outcome of TKA must address prevention of residual pain, stiffness and swelling, and each patient's preoperative concept of the likely outcome of these procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bellemans, J., Colyn, W., Vandenneucker, H., & Victor, J. (2012) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5 · Cited by 1,085
Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Predicts Pain Outcome after Knee Arthroplasty
Riddle, D. L., Wade, J. B., Jiranek, W. A., & Kong, X. (2010) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0963-y · Cited by 406
Predicting Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of 850 Patients
Anakwe, R. E., Jenkins, P. J., & Moran, M. (2011) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013 · Cited by 332
Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review
Waljee, J., McGlinn, E. P., Sears, E. D., & Chung, K. C. (2014) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015 · Cited by 245
Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review
Zywiel, M. G., Mahomed, A., Gandhi, R., Perruccio, A. V., & Mahomed, N. N. (2013) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3013-8 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Noble, P. C., Conditt, M. A., Cook, K. F., & Mathis, K. B.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 452
- Pages
- 35-43
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158067616
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee Arthroplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e
- The paper
- Noble, P. C., Conditt, M. A., Cook, K. F., & Mathis, K. B. (2006). The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.