Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications and Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance

Bridwell, Keith H., Lewis, Stephen J., Edwards, Charles, Lenke, Lawrence G., Iffrig, Theresa M., Berra, Annette, Baldus, Christine, Blanke, Kathy·2003·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic analysis, outcomes analysis (pain scale, Oswestry, SRS-24), and accumulation of complications. Outcomes and complications collected prospectively. Radiographic analysis performed retrospectively. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and stress complications of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for patients with fixed sagittal imbalance. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few reports on pedicle subtraction osteotomies exist in the peer-review literature for conditions other than trauma and ankylosing spondylitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with sagittal imbalance treated with lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy at one institution (minimum 2-year follow-up) were analyzed. Complications were also analyzed for the entire group of consecutive pedicle subtraction osteotomies done at our institution to date (n = 66). RESULTS: For the 33 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, there were significant improvements in the overall Oswestry score (P 0.0001) and pain score (P = 0.0001). Most patients reported improvement in pain and self-image and reported overall satisfaction based on ultimate SRS-24 questionnaire. There was one pseudarthrosis in the lumbar spine through an area of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (area of previous laminectomy and nonunion), and six patients had thoracic pseudarthroses (levels other than the osteotomy level) and one patient had a pseudarthrosis at L5-S1. Two patients had acute angular kyphosis at the thoracolumbar junction at the proximal end of the construct. Five patients who experienced transient neurologic deficits resolved their deficits after central canal enlargement. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical result with pedicle subtraction osteotomy is reduced with pseudarthrosis in the thoracic or lumbar spine and subsequent breakdown adjacent to the fusion. For patients with a degenerative sagittal imbalance etiology the results were worse and the complications were higher. Central canal enlargement is critical.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000090891.60232.70

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Bridwell, K. H., Lewis, S. J., Edwards, C., Lenke, L. G., Iffrig, T. M., Berra, A., Baldus, C., & Blanke, K.
Venue
Spine
Published
2003-09
Volume
28
Issue
18
Pages
2093-2101
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029995668
Cited by
360
References
1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications and Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000090891.60232.70
The paper
Bridwell, K. H., Lewis, S. J., Edwards, C., Lenke, L. G., Iffrig, T. M., Berra, A., Baldus, C., & Blanke, K. (2003). Complications and Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000090891.60232.70

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.