The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Epidemiology and Genetic Influences
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A literature review. Objective. To synthesize the scientific literature on the prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration and factors associated with its occurrence, including genetic influences. Methods. A literature review was conducted of the prevalence of disc degeneration. Studies of the etiology of disc degeneration were summarized, with particular attention given to studies of genetic influences. Results and Conclusions. There are extreme variations in the reported prevalence of specific degenerative findings of the lumbar spine among studies, which cannot be explained entirely by age or other identifiable risk factors (e.g., prevalence figures for disc narrowing varied from 3% to 56%). It is likely that these variations are due, in great part, to inconsistencies in case definitions and measurements, which are impeding epidemiologic research on disc degeneration. Research conducted over the past decade has led to a dramatic shift in the understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. Previously, heavy physical loading was the main suspected risk factor for disc degeneration. However, results of exposure-discordant monozygotic and classic twin studies suggest that physical loading specific to occupation and sport has a relatively minor role in disc degeneration, beyond that of upright postures and routine activities of daily living. Recent research indicates that heredity has a dominant role in disc degeneration, explaining 74% of the variance in adult populations studied to date. Since 1998, genetic influences have been confirmed by the identification of several gene forms associated with disc degeneration. The article reviews the epidemiology of lumbar disc degeneration, including what is known of its prevalence and factors associated with its occurrence. In particular, it highlights some of the research contributing to the dramatic shift taking place in the understanding of disc degeneration and its etiology. The role of genetic influences is a dominant feature of this shift.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berenson, G. S., Wattigney, W. A., Tracy, R. E., Newman, W. P., Srinivasan, S. R., Webber, L. S., Dalferes, E. R., & Strong, J. P. (1992) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(92)90726-f · Cited by 591
Cited by
Lumbar Disc Disorders and Low-Back Pain: Socioeconomic Factors and Consequences
Katz, J. N. (2006) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.01273 · Cited by 1,645
Jensen, T. S., Karppinen, J., Sorensen, J. S., Niinimäki, J., & Leboeuf-Yde, C. (2008) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0770-2 · Cited by 470
The Twin Spine Study: Contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration†
Battié, M. C., Videman, T., Kaprio, J., Gibbons, L. E., Gill, K., Manninen, H., Saarela, J., & Peltonen, L. (2009) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.011 · Cited by 367
Self-citationBell, J. A., & Burnett, A. (2009) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9164-5 · Cited by 159
Suri, P., Rainville, J., Katz, J. N., Jouve, C., Hartigan, C., Limke, J., Pena, E., Li, L., Swaim, B., & Hunter, D. J. (2011) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181c953cc · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Battié, M. C., Videman, T., & Parent, E.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2679-2690
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010306202
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Epidemiology and Genetic Influences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000146457.83240.eb
- The paper
- Battié, M. C., Videman, T., & Parent, E. (2004). Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Epidemiology and Genetic Influences. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000146457.83240.eb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.