Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,898

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity

Glassman, Steven D., Bridwell, Keith, Dimar, John R., Horton, William, Berven, Sigurd, Schwab, Frank·2005·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of 752 patients with adult spinal deformity enrolled in a multicenter prospective database in 2002 and 2003. Patients with positive sagittal balance (N = 352) were further evaluated regarding radiographic parameters and health status measures, including the Scoliosis Research Society patient questionnaire, MOS short form-12, and Oswestry Disability Index. OBJECTIVES: To examine patients with adult deformity with positive sagittal balance to define parameters within that group that might differentially predict clinical impact. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In a multicenter study of 298 adults with spinal deformity, positive sagittal balance was identified as the radiographic parameter most highly correlated with adverse health status outcomes. METHODS: Radiographic evaluation was performed according to a standardized protocol for 36-inch standing radiographs. Magnitude of positive sagittal balance and regional sagittal Cobb angle measures were recorded. Statistical correlation between radiographic parameters and health status measures were performed. Potentially confounding variables were assessed. RESULTS: Positive sagittal balance was identified in 352 patients. The C7 plumb line deviation ranged from 1 to 271 mm. All measures of health status showed significantly poorer scores as C7 plumb line deviation increased. Patients with relative kyphosis in the lumbar region had significantly more disability than patients with normal or lordotic lumbar sagittal Cobb measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that although even mildly positive sagittal balance is somewhat detrimental, severity of symptoms increases in a linear fashion with progressive sagittal imbalance. The results also show that kyphosis is more favorable in the upper thoracic region but very poorly tolerated in the lumbar spine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,898

Metadata

Authors
Glassman, S. D., Bridwell, K., Dimar, J. R., Horton, W., Berven, S., & Schwab, F.
Venue
Spine
Published
2005-09
Volume
30
Issue
18
Pages
2024-2029
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027788451
Cited by
1,898
References
5
FWCI
13.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96
The paper
Glassman, S. D., Bridwell, K., Dimar, J. R., Horton, W., Berven, S., & Schwab, F. (2005). The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.