The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, clinical features, and treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) treated at a Canadian tertiary care center. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding the current epidemiology of acute traumatic SCI is essential for public resource allocation and primary prevention. Recent reports suggest that the mean age of patients with SCI may be increasing. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed hospital records on all patients with traumatic SCI between January 1997 and June 2001 (n = 151). Variables assessed included age, gender, length of hospitalization, type and mechanism of injury, associated spinal fractures, neurologic deficit, and treatment. RESULTS: Annual age-adjusted incidence rates were 42.4 per million for adults aged 15-64 years, and 51.4 per million for those 65 years and older. Motor vehicle accidents accounted for 35% of SCI. Falls were responsible for 63% of SCI among patients older than 65 years and for 31% of injuries overall. Cervical SCI was most common, particularly in the elderly, and was associated with fracture in only 56% of cases. Thoracic and lumbar SCI were associated with spinal fractures in 100% and 85% of cases, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 8%. Mortality was significantly higher among the elderly. Treatment of thoracic and lumbar fractures associated with SCI was predominantly surgical, whereas cervical fractures were equally likely to be treated with external immobilization alone or with surgery. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of injuries was seen among older adults, predominantly as a result of falls. Prevention programs should expand their focus to include home safety and avoidance of falls in the elderly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Traumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume
Kumar, R., Lim, J., Mekary, R. A., Rattani, A., Dewan, M. C., Sharif, S. Y., Osorio-Fonseca, E., & Park, K. B. (2018) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 · Cited by 657
Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries
Nas, K. (2015) · World Journal of Orthopedics · doi:10.5312/wjo.v6.i1.8 · Cited by 515
Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review
Kang, Y., Ding, H., Zhou, H., Wei, Z., Liu, L., Pan, D., & Feng, S. (2017) · Journal of Neurorestoratology · doi:10.2147/jn.s143236 · Cited by 315
Global Incidence and Prevalence of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Furlan, J. C., Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., & Krassioukov, A. V. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/s0317167100014530 · Cited by 305
Bajracharya, S., Singh, M., Singh, G., & Shrestha, B. (2007) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.4103/0019-5413.36988 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickett, G. E., Campos-Benitez, M., Keller, J. L., & Duggal, N.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 799-805
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052295747
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000207258.80129.03
- The paper
- Pickett, G. E., Campos-Benitez, M., Keller, J. L., & Duggal, N. (2006). Epidemiology of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000207258.80129.03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.