The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of the Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Pelvis Using Shape and Orientation Parameters
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to introduce a method to analyze and characterize the global sagittal balance of the human trunk using indexes derived from the shape and orientation of the pelvis and cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. METHODS: Standing lateral x-rays of a cohort of 160 asymptomatic young adult volunteers were obtained. On each radiograph, a simplified model of the spine and pelvis was created using a dedicated computer software, and the following shape and orientation variables were calculated at each anatomic level: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, cervical curvature and tilt, thoracic curvature and tilt, and lumbar curvature and tilt. RESULTS: Significant linear correlations were found between each single adjacent shape parameter as well as between each single adjacent orientation parameter at all anatomic levels. Significant correlations were also found between some shape and orientation parameters at the same anatomic level as well as between adjacent anatomic areas. In general, the linear correlations were stronger between shape and orientation variables at the pelvic, lumbar, and cervical areas and weaker at the thoracic level and between the thoracic and lumbar areas. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that the pelvis and spine in the sagittal plane can be considered as a linear chain linking the head to the pelvis where the shape and orientation of each anatomic segment are closely related and influence the adjacent segment to maintain a stable posture with a minimum of energy expenditure. Changes in shape or orientation at one level will have a direct influence on the adjacent segment. Knowledge of these normal relationships is of prime importance for the comprehension of sagittal balance in normal and pathologic conditions of the spine and pelvis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schwab, F., Lafage, V., Boyce, R., Skalli, W., & Farcy, J.-P. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000248126.96737.0f · Cited by 466
Multivariate comparison of classification performance measures
Ballabio, D., Grisoni, F., & Todeschini, R. (2018) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.12.004 · Cited by 328
Richards, K. V., Beales, D. J., Smith, A. J., O'Sullivan, P. B., & Straker, L. M. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20150660 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Berthonnaud, E., Dimnet, J., Roussouly, P., & Labelle, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-47
- ISSN
- 1536-0652 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994812698
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Pelvis Using Shape and Orientation Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.bsd.0000117542.88865.77
- The paper
- Berthonnaud, E., Dimnet, J., Roussouly, P., & Labelle, H. (2005). Analysis of the Sagittal Balance of the Spine and Pelvis Using Shape and Orientation Parameters. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000117542.88865.77
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.