The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical impact of pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in intubated patients: A matched cohort study*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii (VAPAB) is associated with increased mortality rate. DESIGN: A retrospective matched case-control study in which all intensive care unit adult patients with microbiologically documented VAPAB were defined as cases. SETTING: Four intensive care units from teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Sixty patients were matched to sixty controls. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Controls were matched based on stay before pneumonia onset, disease severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) at admission, and diagnostic category. Population characteristics and intensive care unit mortality rates of patients with VAPAB and their controls were compared. Attributable mortality was determined by subtracting the crude mortality rate of the controls from the crude mortality rate of the case patients. Twenty-four of the 60 case patients died, representing a crude mortality rate of 40%, whereas 17 of the 60 controls died, a crude mortality rate of 28.3% (p =.17). Crude intensive care unit mortality was the same (12 of 35, 34.2%) in patients with VAPAB caused by strains sensitive to imipenem and in their matched controls. It was 44% for the 25 patients with imipenem-resistant strains with an estimated attributable mortality rate of 20.0% (95% confidence interval, -5.6% to 45.7%). Mean intensive care unit stay of patients and controls was 35.3 and 36.6 days, respectively (p = nonsignificant). CONCLUSION: In intubated patients, pneumonia by A. baumannii is not significantly associated with attributable mortality rate or an increased length of intensive care unit stay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Candida sp Isolated From Bronchoscopic Samples in Nonneutropenic Patients
Rello, J., Esandi, M.-E., Diaz, E., Mariscal, D., Gallego, M., & Vallès, J. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.114.1.146 · Cited by 155
Self-citation
Cited by
Acinetobacter baumannii : Emergence of a Successful Pathogen
Peleg, A. Y., Seifert, H., & Paterson, D. L. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00058-07 · Cited by 3,316
Munoz-Price, L. S., & Weinstein, R. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra070741 · Cited by 772
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter Infection Mortality Rate and Length of Hospitalization
Sunenshine, R. H., Wright, M.-O., Maragakis, L. L., Harris, A. D., Song, X., Hebden, J., Cosgrove, S. E., Anderson, A., Carnell, J., Jernigan, D. B., et al. (2007) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1301.060716 · Cited by 411
Falagas, M. E., Bliziotis, I. A., & Siempos, I. I. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc4869 · Cited by 272
Magret, M., Lisboa, T., Martin-Loeches, I., Máñez, R., Nauwynck, M., Wrigge, H., Cardellino, S., Díaz, E., Koulenti, D., Rello, J., et al. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10036 · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garnacho, J., Sole-Violan, J., Sa-Borges, M., Diaz, E., & Rello, J.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2478-2482
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024118692
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical impact of pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in intubated patients: A matched cohort study*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000089936.09573.f3
- The paper
- Garnacho, J., Sole-Violan, J., Sa-Borges, M., Diaz, E., & Rello, J. (2003). Clinical impact of pneumonia caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in intubated patients: A matched cohort study*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000089936.09573.f3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.