The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined a physician-performed, goal-directed ultrasound protocol for the emergency department management of nontraumatic, symptomatic, undifferentiated hypotension. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial of immediate vs. delayed ultrasound. SETTING: Urban, tertiary emergency department, census >100,000. PATIENTS: Nontrauma emergency department patients, aged >17 yrs, and initial emergency department vital signs consistent with shock (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg or shock index >1.0), and agreement of two independent observers for at least one sign and symptom of inadequate tissue perfusion. INTERVENTIONS: Group 1 (immediate ultrasound) received standard care plus goal-directed ultrasound at time 0. Group 2 (delayed ultrasound) received standard care for 15 mins and goal-directed ultrasound with standard care between 15 and 30 mins after time 0. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes included the number of viable physician diagnoses at 15 mins and the rank of their likelihood of occurrence at both 15 and 30 mins. One hundred eighty-four patients were included. Group 1 (n = 88) had a smaller median number of viable diagnoses at 15 mins (median = 4) than did group 2 (n = 96, median = 9, Mann-Whitney U test, p <.0001). Physicians indicated the correct final diagnosis as most likely among their viable diagnosis list at 15 mins in 80% (95% confidence interval, 70-87%) of group 1 subjects vs. 50% (95% confidence interval, 40-60%) in group 2, difference of 30% (95% confidence interval, 16-42%). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of a goal-directed ultrasound protocol in the evaluation of nontraumatic, symptomatic, undifferentiated hypotension in adult patients results in fewer viable diagnostic etiologies and a more accurate physician impression of final diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Labovitz, A. J., Noble, V. E., Bierig, M., Goldstein, S. A., Jones, R., Kort, S., Porter, T. R., Spencer, K. T., Tayal, V. S., & Wei, K. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005 · Cited by 769
Self-citationFrankel, H. L., Kirkpatrick, A. W., Elbarbary, M., Blaivas, M., Desai, H., Evans, D., Summerfield, D. T., Slonim, A., Breitkreutz, R., Price, S., et al. (2015) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001216 · Cited by 494
Breitkreutz, R., Walcher, F., & Seeger, F. H. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000260626.23848.fc · Cited by 417
World Interactive Network Focused On Critical UltraSound ECHO-ICU Group, Price, S., Via, G., Sloth, E., Guarracino, F., Breitkreutz, R., Catena, E., & Talmor, D. (2008) · Cardiovascular Ultrasound · doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-49 · Cited by 255
Heffner, A. C., Horton, J. M., Marchick, M. R., & Jones, A. E. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/650580 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, A. E., Tayal, V. S., Sullivan, D. M., & Kline, J. A.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1703-1708
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977403374
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000133017.34137.82
- The paper
- Jones, A. E., Tayal, V. S., Sullivan, D. M., & Kline, J. A. (2004). Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000133017.34137.82
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.