Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 521

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 264 of the 264 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update

Hollenberg, Steven M., Ahrens, Tom S., Annane, Djillali, Astiz, Mark E., Chalfin, Donald B., Dasta, Joseph F., Heard, Stephen O., Martin, Claude, Napolitano, Lena M., Susla, Gregory M., Totaro, Richard, Vincent, Jean-Louis, Zanotti-Cavazzoni, Sergio·2004·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide the American College of Critical Care Medicine with updated guidelines for hemodynamic support of adult patients with sepsis. DATA SOURCE: Publications relevant to hemodynamic support of septic patients were obtained from the medical literature, supplemented by the expertise and experience of members of an international task force convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. STUDY SELECTION: Both human studies and relevant animal studies were considered. DATA SYNTHESIS: The experts articles reviewed the literature and classified the strength of evidence of human studies according to study design and scientific value. Recommendations were drafted and graded levels based on an evidence-based rating system described in the text. The recommendations were debated, and the task force chairman modified the document until <10% of the experts disagreed with the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: An organized approach to the hemodynamic support of sepsis was formulated. The fundamental principle is that clinicians using hemodynamic therapies should define specific goals and end points, titrate therapies to those end points, and evaluate the results of their interventions on an ongoing basis by monitoring a combination of variables of global and regional perfusion. Using this approach, specific recommendations for fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy, and inotropic therapy of septic in adult patients were promulgated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000139761.05492.d6

Cites

264 of 264 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Show all 264 references

Cited by

See all 521

Metadata

Authors
Hollenberg, S. M., Ahrens, T. S., Annane, D., Astiz, M. E., Chalfin, D. B., Dasta, J. F., Heard, S. O., Martin, C., Napolitano, L. M., Susla, G. M., Totaro, R., Vincent, J.-L., & Zanotti-Cavazzoni, S.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2004-09
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1928-1948
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095817953
Cited by
521
References
264
FWCI
33.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000139761.05492.d6
The paper
Hollenberg, S. M., Ahrens, T. S., Annane, D., Astiz, M. E., Chalfin, D. B., Dasta, J. F., Heard, S. O., Martin, C., Napolitano, L. M., Susla, G. M., Totaro, R., Vincent, J.-L., & Zanotti-Cavazzoni, S. (2004). Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000139761.05492.d6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.