Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: Results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator*

Mayo, Paul H., Hackney, Janel E., Mueck, J Tristan, Ribaudo, Vanessa, Schneider, Roslyn F.·2004·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient simulation is emerging as a training technique in the field of medicine. It has particular application in training responses to high-risk, low-frequency clinical events, of which a typical example is in-hospital cardiac arrest. A critical element of response by the cardiac arrest team is initial airway management. In teaching hospitals, medical interns are first responders to in-hospital cardiac arrests. Our objective was to design and test a program using a computer-controlled patient simulator to train medical interns and demonstrate their competence in initial airway management. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, unblinded trial. SETTING: Internal medicine residency training program in an urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All 50 starting internal medicine interns in July 2002, all Advanced Cardiac Life Support certified in June 2002. INTERVENTIONS: All interns were tested in initial airway management skills and then were randomly assigned to receive either immediate or delayed individualized training using a computer-controlled patient simulator. The computer-simulated training process consisted of a scenario of respiratory arrest. The interns were challenged with the scenario twice following testing. The interns were debriefed extensively and given hands-on training by the attending using the simulator until they achieved perfect performance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Initial airway management was divided into specific scorable steps. Individual step scores and total scores were recorded for each intern on initial and repeat testing. For 10 months following simulator training, intern airway management skills were scored in actual patient airway events. Despite recent Advanced Cardiac Life Support training and certification, all starting medical interns demonstrated poor airway management skills. The immediate training group showed significant improvement in initial airway management when tested before and 4 wks after training. In contrast, the delayed training group showed no significant improvement. Direct observation of interns in actual initial airway events revealed excellent clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized training of medical interns using a computer-controlled patient simulator is an effective means of achieving and measuring competence in initial airway management skills. The improvement appears to be transferable to the bedside of real patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147768.42813.a2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Mayo, P. H., Hackney, J. E., Mueck, J. T., Ribaudo, V., & Schneider, R. F.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2004-12
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
2422-2427
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979939315
Cited by
192
References
0
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: Results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000147768.42813.a2
The paper
Mayo, P. H., Hackney, J. E., Mueck, J. T., Ribaudo, V., & Schneider, R. F. (2004). Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: Results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000147768.42813.a2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.