Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*

Bercker, Sven, Weber-Carstens, Steffen, Deja, Maria, Grimm, Claudia, Wolf, Steffen, Behse, Friedrich, Busch, Thilo, Falke, Konrad J., Kaisers, Udo·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy (CIP/CIM) is frequently described in critically ill patients who survive severe sepsis. Clinically relevant paresis is major symptom of CIP/CIM. We aimed at determining risk factors and diagnostic value of electrophysiologic testing for CIP/CIM in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective analysis, using charts. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty consecutive ARDS patients in our intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: Patient characteristics and clinical course were analyzed. All patients received early electrophysiologic testing. CIP/CIM was diagnosed by the presence of clinical relevant paresis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinically relevant paresis was confirmed in 27 ARDS patients (60%), whereas in 18 patients no paresis was determined (controls); five patients died before clinical assessment of paresis was feasible. Patients with paresis were older, had more days on mechanical ventilation, and had increased intensive care unit length of stay compared with controls. Patients who developed paresis had elevated daily peak blood glucose levels during 28 days of intensive care unit treatment: 166 (134, 200) mg/dL in CIP/CIM patients vs. 144 (132, 161) mg/dL in controls (median, quartiles). Twenty-five of 27 patients with paresis revealed reduced motor unit potentials, fibrillation potentials, or positive sharp waves on early electrophysiologic testing indicating CIP/CIM, whereas 16 of 18 control patients did not. CONCLUSIONS: In ARDS patients, paresis is a frequent complication causing prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay. An association between hyperglycemia and CIP/CIM has been found. However, since this is a retrospective survey, a causal relation is not clearly supported. In this study, the use of early electrophysiologic testing in ARDS patients was a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting CIP/CIM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000157969.46388.a2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Bercker, S., Weber-Carstens, S., Deja, M., Grimm, C., Wolf, S., Behse, F., Busch, T., Falke, K. J., & Kaisers, U.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
711-715
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003567405
Cited by
194
References
4
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000157969.46388.a2
The paper
Bercker, S., Weber-Carstens, S., Deja, M., Grimm, C., Wolf, S., Behse, F., Busch, T., Falke, K. J., & Kaisers, U. (2005). Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000157969.46388.a2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.