Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 839

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit

Calandra, Thierry, Cohen, Jonathan·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop definitions of infection that can be used in clinical trials in patients with sepsis. CONTEXT: Infection is a key component of the definition of sepsis, yet there is currently no agreement on the definitions that should be used to identify specific infections in patients with sepsis. Agreeing on a set of valid definitions that can be easily implemented as part of a clinical trial protocol would facilitate patient selection, help classify patients into prospectively defined infection categories, and therefore greatly reduce variability between treatment groups. DESIGN AND METHODS: Experts in infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, and critical care medicine were recruited and allocated specific infection sites. They carried out a systematic literature review and used this, and their own experience, to prepare a draft definition. At a subsequent consensus conference, rapporteurs presented the draft definitions, and these were then refined and improved during discussion. Modifications were circulated electronically and subsequently agreed upon as part of an iterative process until consensus was reached. RESULT: Consensus definitions of infection were developed for the six most frequent causes of infections in septic patients: pneumonia, bloodstream infections (including infective endocarditis), intravascular catheter-related sepsis, intra-abdominal infections, urosepsis, and surgical wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: We have described standardized definitions of the common sites of infection associated with sepsis in critically ill patients. Use of these definitions in clinical trials should help improve the quality of clinical research in this field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 839

Metadata

Authors
Calandra, T., & Cohen, J.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-07
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1538-1548
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125789788
Cited by
839
References
1
FWCI
20.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83
The paper
Calandra, T., & Cohen, J. (2005). The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.