The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop definitions of infection that can be used in clinical trials in patients with sepsis. CONTEXT: Infection is a key component of the definition of sepsis, yet there is currently no agreement on the definitions that should be used to identify specific infections in patients with sepsis. Agreeing on a set of valid definitions that can be easily implemented as part of a clinical trial protocol would facilitate patient selection, help classify patients into prospectively defined infection categories, and therefore greatly reduce variability between treatment groups. DESIGN AND METHODS: Experts in infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, and critical care medicine were recruited and allocated specific infection sites. They carried out a systematic literature review and used this, and their own experience, to prepare a draft definition. At a subsequent consensus conference, rapporteurs presented the draft definitions, and these were then refined and improved during discussion. Modifications were circulated electronically and subsequently agreed upon as part of an iterative process until consensus was reached. RESULT: Consensus definitions of infection were developed for the six most frequent causes of infections in septic patients: pneumonia, bloodstream infections (including infective endocarditis), intravascular catheter-related sepsis, intra-abdominal infections, urosepsis, and surgical wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: We have described standardized definitions of the common sites of infection associated with sepsis in critically ill patients. Use of these definitions in clinical trials should help improve the quality of clinical research in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospective Multicenter Surveillance Study of Funguria in Hospitalized Patients
Kauffman, C. A., Vazquez, J. A., Sobel, J. D., Gallis, H. A., McKinsey, D. S., Karchmer, A. W., Sugar, A. M., Sharkey, P. K., Wise, G. J., Mangi, R., et al. (2000) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/313583 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017.
Vincent, J.-L., Sakr, Y., Singer, M., Martin-Loeches, I., Machado, F. R., Marshall, J. C., Finfer, S., Pelosi, P., Brazzi, L., Aditianingsih, D., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2717 · Cited by 1,011
Use of Procalcitonin to Shorten Antibiotic Treatment Duration in Septic Patients
Nobre, V., Harbarth, S., Graf, J.-D., Rohner, P., & Pugin, J. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200708-1238oc · Cited by 605
Singer, P., Anbar, R., Cohen, J., Shapiro, H., Shalita-Chesner, M., Lev, S., Grozovski, E., Theilla, M., Frishman, S., & Madar, Z. (2011) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-011-2146-z · Cited by 566
Self-citationNew Approaches to Sepsis: Molecular Diagnostics and Biomarkers
Reinhart, K., Bauer, M., Riedemann, N. C., & Hartog, C. S. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00016-12 · Cited by 533
Metadata
- Authors
- Calandra, T., & Cohen, J.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1538-1548
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125789788
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83
- The paper
- Calandra, T., & Cohen, J. (2005). The International Sepsis Forum Consensus Conference on Definitions of Infection in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.