Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ICU Trial: A new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation*

Lecuyer, Lucien, Chevret, Sylvie, Thiery, Guillaume, Darmon, Michael, Schlemmer, Benoît, Azoulay, Élie·2007·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation are widely viewed as poor candidates for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. We designed a prospective study evaluating a new admission policy titled The ICU Trial. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-eight patients requiring mechanical ventilation and having at least one other organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Over a 3-yr period, all patients with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors proposed for ICU admission underwent a triage procedure. Bedridden patients and patients in whom palliative care was the only cancer treatment option were not admitted to the ICU. Patients at earliest phase of the malignancy (diagnosis < 30 days) were admitted without any restriction. All other patients were prospectively included in The ICU Trial, consisting of a full-code ICU admission followed by reappraisal of the level of care on day 5. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among the 188 patients, 103 survived the first 4 ICU days and 85 died from the acute illness. Hospital survival was 21.8% overall. Among the 103 survivors on day 5, none of the characteristics of the malignancy were significantly different between the 62 patients who died and the 41 who survived. Time course of organ dysfunction over the first 6 ICU days differed significantly between survivors and nonsurvivors. Organ failure scores were more accurate on day 6 than at admission or on day 3 for predicting survival. All patients who required initiation of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, or dialysis after 3 days in the ICU died. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was 40% in mechanically ventilated cancer patients who survived to day 5 and 21.8% overall. If these results are confirmed in future interventional studies, we recommend ICU admission with full-code management followed by reappraisal on day 6 in all nonbedridden cancer patients for whom lifespan-extending cancer treatment is available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000256846.27192.7a

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Lecuyer, L., Chevret, S., Thiery, G., Darmon, M., Schlemmer, B., & Azoulay, É.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
808-814
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027774931
Cited by
356
References
33
FWCI
17.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ICU Trial: A new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000256846.27192.7a
The paper
Lecuyer, L., Chevret, S., Thiery, G., Darmon, M., Schlemmer, B., & Azoulay, É. (2007). The ICU Trial: A new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000256846.27192.7a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.