Cited by 44Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effect of amphetamine on Kamin blocking and overshadowing

O'Tuathaigh, C. M.P., Salum, C., Young, A. M.J., Pickering, A. D., Joseph, M. H., Moran, P. M.·2003·Behavioural Pharmacology

Abstract

Schizophrenic patients show deficits on stimulus salience tasks such as latent inhibition and blocking, which measure the ability to disregard irrelevant stimuli. Amphetamine-treated animals show similar deficits in analogous tasks, thereby providing a model of the stimulus-selection deficits observed in schizophrenia. In two experiments, the effect of the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist D-amphetamine sulphate (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) on Kamin blocking and overshadowing were examined and compared, in the rat, using the conditioned lick suppression procedure. The aim was to provide some insight into the behavioural and pharmacological mechanisms underlying amphetamine effects in both paradigms. In experiment 1, it was shown that amphetamine selectively disrupted Kamin blocking, when given either at stage 2 alone, or at both stages of the task. In experiment 2, amphetamine treatment significantly abolished Kamin blocking and overshadowing, when administered prior to compound conditioning in both tasks. These data suggest that dopamine may play a critical role in mediating performance in tasks measuring stimulus salience processes. The results are discussed in the framework of the role of DA in stimulus-selection performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.fbp.0000080416.18561.3e

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some trait-like phenomena (reduced latent inhibition, blocking, body ownership illusion) can be reproduced by both ketamine and dopaminergic agonists.

    “some trait-like phenomena can be reproduced by both ketamine and dopaminergic agonists, such as reduced latent inhibition (Young et al., 2005; Razoux et al., 2007), blocking (O’Tuathaigh et al., 2003; Freeman et al., 2013), and the body ownership illusion (Albrecht et al., 2011; Morgan et al., 2011)”

    From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as O’Tuathaigh et al., 2003

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Tuathaigh, C. M. P., Salum, C., Young, A. M. J., Pickering, A. D., Joseph, M. H., & Moran, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Estácio (Brazil) (BR)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Moran, P. M.
Venue
Behavioural Pharmacology
Published
2003-07
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
315-322
ISSN
0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040819955
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amphetamine, overshadowing, latent inhibition, stimulus salience, stimulus selection, schizophrenia, dopamine, compound conditioning
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Dopamine Agents, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review