The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of amphetamine on Kamin blocking and overshadowing
Abstract
Schizophrenic patients show deficits on stimulus salience tasks such as latent inhibition and blocking, which measure the ability to disregard irrelevant stimuli. Amphetamine-treated animals show similar deficits in analogous tasks, thereby providing a model of the stimulus-selection deficits observed in schizophrenia. In two experiments, the effect of the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist D-amphetamine sulphate (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) on Kamin blocking and overshadowing were examined and compared, in the rat, using the conditioned lick suppression procedure. The aim was to provide some insight into the behavioural and pharmacological mechanisms underlying amphetamine effects in both paradigms. In experiment 1, it was shown that amphetamine selectively disrupted Kamin blocking, when given either at stage 2 alone, or at both stages of the task. In experiment 2, amphetamine treatment significantly abolished Kamin blocking and overshadowing, when administered prior to compound conditioning in both tasks. These data suggest that dopamine may play a critical role in mediating performance in tasks measuring stimulus salience processes. The results are discussed in the framework of the role of DA in stimulus-selection performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some trait-like phenomena (reduced latent inhibition, blocking, body ownership illusion) can be reproduced by both ketamine and dopaminergic agonists.
“some trait-like phenomena can be reproduced by both ketamine and dopaminergic agonists, such as reduced latent inhibition (Young et al., 2005; Razoux et al., 2007), blocking (O’Tuathaigh et al., 2003; Freeman et al., 2013), and the body ownership illusion (Albrecht et al., 2011; Morgan et al., 2011)”
From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as O’Tuathaigh et al., 2003
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis
Adams, R. A., Stephan, K. E., Brown, H. R., Frith, C. D., & Friston, K. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00047 · Cited by 850
Ketamine effects on memory reconsolidation favor a learning model of delusions
Corlett, P. R., Cambridge, V., Gardner, J. M., Piggot, J. S., Turner, D. C., Everitt, J. C., Arana, F. S., Morgan, H. L., Milton, A. L., Lee, J. L., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065088 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Tuathaigh, C. M. P., Salum, C., Young, A. M. J., Pickering, A. D., Joseph, M. H., & Moran, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Estácio (Brazil) (BR)
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Moran, P. M.
- Venue
- Behavioural Pharmacology
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-322
- ISSN
- 0955-8810 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040819955
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- amphetamine, overshadowing, latent inhibition, stimulus salience, stimulus selection, schizophrenia, dopamine, compound conditioning
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Dopamine Agents, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review