The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Opioid use in chronic pain treatment is complex, as patients may derive both benefit and harm. Identification of individuals currently using opioids in a problematic way is important given the substantial recent increases in prescription rates and consequent increases in morbidity and mortality. The present review provides updated and expanded information regarding rates of problematic opioid use in chronic pain. Because previous reviews have indicated substantial variability in this literature, several steps were taken to enhance precision and utility. First, problematic use was coded using explicitly defined terms, referring to different patterns of use (ie, misuse, abuse, and addiction). Second, average prevalence rates were calculated and weighted by sample size and study quality. Third, the influence of differences in study methodology was examined. In total, data from 38 studies were included. Rates of problematic use were quite broad, ranging from <1% to 81% across studies. Across most calculations, rates of misuse averaged between 21% and 29% (range, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 13%-38%). Rates of addiction averaged between 8% and 12% (range, 95% CI: 3%-17%). Abuse was reported in only a single study. Only 1 difference emerged when study methods were examined, where rates of addiction were lower in studies that identified prevalence assessment as a primary, rather than secondary, objective. Although significant variability remains in this literature, this review provides guidance regarding possible average rates of opioid misuse and addiction and also highlights areas in need of further clarification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States
Gaskin, D. J., & Richard, P. (2012) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009 · Cited by 2,359
Opioid Epidemic in the United States
Manchikanti, L. (2012) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2012/15/es9 · Cited by 1,180
Webster, L. R., & Webster, R. M. (2005) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00072.x · Cited by 1,096
Characteristics of Opioid Prescriptions in 2009
Volkow, N. D. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.401 · Cited by 815
Martell, B. A., O'Connor, P. G., Kerns, R. D., Becker, W. C., Morales, K. H., Kosten, T. R., & Fiellin, D. A. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-2-200701160-00006 · Cited by 774
Societal costs of prescription opioid abuse, dependence, and misuse in the United States
Birnbaum, H. G., White, A. G., Schiller, M., Waldman, T., Cleveland, J. M., & Roland, C. L. (2011) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01075.x · Cited by 644
Therapeutic Use, Abuse, and Nonmedical Use of Opioids: A Ten-Year Perspective
Manchikanti, L. (2010) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2010/13/401 · Cited by 545
Cited by
Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances
Cohen, S. P., Vase, L., & Hooten, W. M. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00393-7 · Cited by 2,614
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022
Dowell, D., Ragan, K. R., Jones, C. M., Baldwin, G. T., & Chou, R. (2022) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1 · Cited by 1,886
Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain — Misconceptions and Mitigation Strategies
Volkow, N. D., & McLellan, A. T. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1507771 · Cited by 1,305
Briggs, A. M., Cross, M. J., Hoy, D. G., Sànchez-Riera, L., Blyth, F. M., Woolf, A. D., & March, L. (2016) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnw002 · Cited by 710
Chronic Pain and Mental Health Disorders
Hooten, W. M. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.04.029 · Cited by 571
Metadata
- Authors
- Vowles, K. E., McEntee, M. L., Julnes, P. S., Frohe, T., Ney, J. P., & van der Goes, D. N.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972242861
- Cited by
- 1,154
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 75.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460357.01998.f1
- The paper
- Vowles, K. E., McEntee, M. L., Julnes, P. S., Frohe, T., Ney, J. P., & van der Goes, D. N. (2015). Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460357.01998.f1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.