CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 646Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sickness Presenteeism: Prevalence, Attendance-Pressure Factors, and an Outline of a Model for Research

Aronsson, Gunnar, Gustafsson, Klas·2005·Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sickness presence, that is, going to work despite judging one's current state of health as such that sick leave should be taken, was investigated in relation to different work and background factors. METHODS: The study group comprised a random sample of 3136 persons who responded to a questionnaire administered in conjunction with Statistics Sweden's labor market survey. Logistic regressions were used in the analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent reported the presence of sickness (on more than one occasion during the preceding year). Having a health problem is a strong determinant of sickness presenteeism (odds ratio = 3.32). For any given health status, there are certain other factors (personally and work-related demands) that impact on the risk of sickness presence, such as difficulties in staff replacement, time pressure, insufficient resources, and poor personal financial situation. CONCLUSIONS: The study has identified different types of determinants of sickness presence. Under the assumption that there is a connection between high sickness presence and risk for future ill health, the results may provide assistance in the formulation of preventive measures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–644 of 644

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aronsson, G., & Gustafsson, K.
Corresponding author
Aronsson, Gunnar
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2005-09
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
958-966
ISSN
1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17
OpenAlex
W2030766007
Cited by
646
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sickness presenteeism, sick leave, health status, time pressure, personal financial situation, occupational health, preventive measures
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Workplace, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review