The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urodynamic Effect of Acute Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder
Abstract
PURPOSE: Of the various treatments proposed for urge incontinence, frequency and urgency electrostimulation has been widely tested. Different techniques have been used with the necessity of surgical implantation (S3 neuromodulation or sacral root stimulation) or without requiring surgery (perineal transcutaneous electrostimulation). Recently peripheral electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve was proposed for irritative symptoms in first intention or for intractable incontinence. Clinical studies have demonstrated good results and urodynamic parameters were improved after chronic treatment. However, to our knowledge no data concerning acute stimulation and immediate cystometry modifications have been reported. We verified urodynamic changes during acute posterior tibial nerve stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 consecutive patients with urge incontinence, frequency and urgency secondary to overactive bladder were studied. There were 29 women and 15 men with a mean age +/-SD of 53.3 +/- 18.2 years. Of the patients 37 had detrusor hyperreflexia due to multiple sclerosis (13), spinal cord injury (15) or Parkinson's disease (9), and 7 had idiopathic detrusor instability. Routine cystometry at 50 ml. per minute was done to select the patients with involuntary detrusor contractions appearing before 400 ml. maximum filling volume. Repeat cystometry was performed immediately after the first study during left posterior tibial nerve stimulation using a surface self-adhesive electrode on the ankle skin behind the internal malleolus with shocks in continuous mode at 10 Hz. frequency and 200 milliseconds wide. Volume comparison was done at the first involuntary detrusor contraction and at maximum cystometric capacity. The test was considered positive if volume at the first involuntary detrusor contraction and/or at maximum cystometric capacity increased 100 ml. or 50% during stimulation in compared with standard cystometry volumes. RESULTS: Mean first involuntary detrusor contraction volume on standard cystometry was 162.9 +/- 96.4 ml. and it was 232.1 +/- 115.3 ml. during posterior tibial nerve stimulation. Mean maximum cystometric capacity on standard cystometry was 221 +/- 129.5 ml. and it was 277.4 +/- 117.9 ml. during stimulation. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation was associated with significant improvement in first involuntary detrusor contraction volume (p <0.0001) and significant improvement in maximum cystometric capacity (p <0.0001). The test was considered positive in 22 of the 44 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest an objective acute effect of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on urodynamic parameters. Improved bladder overactivity is an encouraging argument to propose posterior tibial nerve stimulation as a noninvasive treatment modality in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrical Stimulation in the Clinical Management of the Neurogenic Bladder
Tanagho, E. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42038-6 · Cited by 425
Treatment of Motor and Sensory Detrusor Instability by Electrical Stimulation
Mcguire, E. J., Shi-chun, Z., Horwinski, E. R., & Lytton, B. (1983) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)51928-x · Cited by 400
The first 500 patients with sacral anterior root stimulator implants: general description
Brindley, G. S. (1994) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.1994.126 · Cited by 318
Fall, M., & Lindström, S. (1991) · Urologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0094-0143(21)01005-3 · Cited by 278
GOVIER, F. E., LITWILLER, S., NITTI, V., KREDER, K. J., & ROSENBLATT, P. (2001) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66469-5 · Cited by 267
Detrusor inhibition induced by stimulation of pudendal nerve afferents
Vodusek, D. B., Light, J. K., & Libby, J. M. (1986) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.1930050404 · Cited by 265
POSTERIOR TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION AS NEUROMODULATIVE TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT DYSFUNCTION
van BALKEN, M. R., VANDONINCK, V., GISOLF, K. W. H., VERGUNST, H., KIEMENEY, L. A. L. M., DEBRUYNE, F. M. J., & BEMELMANS, B. L. H. (2001) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65863-6 · Cited by 214
Klingler, H. C., Pycha, A., Schmidbauer, J., & Marberger, M. (2000) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00727-5 · Cited by 164
Yamanishi, T., Sakakibara, R., Uchiyama, T., Suda, S., Hattori, T., Itô, H., & Yasuda, K. (2000) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00779-2 · Cited by 86
Bower, W., Moore, K. H., Adams, R. D., et al. (1998) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/00005392-199812010-00049 · Cited by 76
Cited by
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation
Sheffler, L. R., & Chae, J. (2007) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20758 · Cited by 529
Control of urinary bladder function with devices: successes and failures
Gaunt, R. A., & Prochazka, A. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)52011-9 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- AMARENCO, G., ISMAEL, S. S., EVEN-SCHNEIDER, A., RAIBAUT, P., DEMAILLE-WLODYKA, S., PARRATTE, B., & KERDRAON, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2210-2215
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1999504884
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urodynamic Effect of Acute Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000067446.17576.bd
- The paper
- AMARENCO, G., ISMAEL, S. S., EVEN-SCHNEIDER, A., RAIBAUT, P., DEMAILLE-WLODYKA, S., PARRATTE, B., & KERDRAON, J. (2003). Urodynamic Effect of Acute Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Overactive Bladder. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067446.17576.bd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.