Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer

OHORI, MAKOTO, KATTAN, MICHAEL W., KOH, HIDESHIGE, MARU, NORIO, SLAWIN, KEVIN M., SHARIAT, SHAHROKH, MURAMOTO, MASATOSHI, REUTER, VICTOR E., WHEELER, THOMAS M., SCARDINO, PETER T.·2004·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a model to predict the side specific probability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens based on the clinical features of the cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 763 patients with clinical stage T1c-T3 prostate cancer who were diagnosed by systematic needle biopsy and subsequently treated with RP. Candidate predictor variables associated with ECE were clinical T stage, the highest Gleason sum in any core, percent positive cores, percent cancer in the cores from each side and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of each variable alone and in combination. We constructed and internally validated nomograms to predict the side specific probability of ECE based on logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall 30% of the patients and 17% of 1,526 prostate lobes (left or right) had ECE. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the standard features in predicting side specific probability of ECE were 0.627 for PSA, 0.695 for clinical T stage on each side and 0.727 for Gleason sum on each side. When these features were combined predictive accuracy increased to 0.788. The highest value (0.806) was achieved by adding the percent positive cores and the percent cancer in the biopsy specimen to the standard features. The resulting nomograms were internally validated and had excellent calibration and discrimination accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Standard clinical features of prostate cancer in each lobe-PSA, palpable induration and biopsy Gleason sum-can be used to predict the side specific probability of ECE in RP specimens. The predictive accuracy is increased by adding information from systematic biopsy results. The predictive nomograms are sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice in decisions such as wide versus close dissection of the cavernous nerves from the prostate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
OHORI, M., KATTAN, M. W., KOH, H., MARU, N., SLAWIN, K. M., SHARIAT, S., MURAMOTO, M., REUTER, V. E., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2004-05
Volume
171
Issue
5
Pages
1844-1849
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2082202613
Cited by
297
References
2
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d
The paper
OHORI, M., KATTAN, M. W., KOH, H., MARU, N., SLAWIN, K. M., SHARIAT, S., MURAMOTO, M., REUTER, V. E., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2004). Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.