The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: We developed a model to predict the side specific probability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens based on the clinical features of the cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 763 patients with clinical stage T1c-T3 prostate cancer who were diagnosed by systematic needle biopsy and subsequently treated with RP. Candidate predictor variables associated with ECE were clinical T stage, the highest Gleason sum in any core, percent positive cores, percent cancer in the cores from each side and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of each variable alone and in combination. We constructed and internally validated nomograms to predict the side specific probability of ECE based on logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall 30% of the patients and 17% of 1,526 prostate lobes (left or right) had ECE. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the standard features in predicting side specific probability of ECE were 0.627 for PSA, 0.695 for clinical T stage on each side and 0.727 for Gleason sum on each side. When these features were combined predictive accuracy increased to 0.788. The highest value (0.806) was achieved by adding the percent positive cores and the percent cancer in the biopsy specimen to the standard features. The resulting nomograms were internally validated and had excellent calibration and discrimination accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Standard clinical features of prostate cancer in each lobe-PSA, palpable induration and biopsy Gleason sum-can be used to predict the side specific probability of ECE in RP specimens. The predictive accuracy is increased by adding information from systematic biopsy results. The predictive nomograms are sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice in decisions such as wide versus close dissection of the cavernous nerves from the prostate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
FACTORS PREDICTING RECOVERY OF ERECTIONS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
RABBANI, F., STAPLETON, A. M. F., KATTAN, M. W., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2000) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66921-2 · Cited by 487
Self-citation
Cited by
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Mohler, J. L., Antonarakis, E. S., Armstrong, A. J., D’Amico, A. V., Davis, B. J., Dorff, T., Eastham, J. A., Enke, C. A., Farrington, T. A., Higano, C. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023 · Cited by 1,532
Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Survival in Patients With Stage II or III Gastric Cancer
Jiang, Y., Li, T., Liang, X., Hu, Y., Huang, L., Liao, Z., Zhao, L., Han, Z., Zhu, S., Wang, M., et al. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1087 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- OHORI, M., KATTAN, M. W., KOH, H., MARU, N., SLAWIN, K. M., SHARIAT, S., MURAMOTO, M., REUTER, V. E., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1844-1849
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2082202613
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d
- The paper
- OHORI, M., KATTAN, M. W., KOH, H., MARU, N., SLAWIN, K. M., SHARIAT, S., MURAMOTO, M., REUTER, V. E., WHEELER, T. M., & SCARDINO, P. T. (2004). Predicting the Presence and Side of Extracapsular Extension: A Nomogram for Staging Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000121693.05077.3d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.