The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A SINGLE IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE INSTILLATION OF CHEMOTHERAPY DECREASES THE RISK OF RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE Ta T1 BLADDER CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined if 1 immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection (TUR) decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Ta T1 single and multiple bladder cancer overall and separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed of the published results of randomized clinical trials comparing TUR alone to TUR plus 1 immediate instillation of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Our study included 7 randomized trials with recurrence information on 1476 patients. Based on a median followup of 3.4 years and a maximum of 14.5 years, 267 of 728 patients (36.7%) receiving 1 postoperative instillation of epirubicin, mitomycin C, thiotepa or (2'R)-4'-O-tetrahydropyranyl-doxorubicin (pirarubicin) had recurrence compared to 362 of 748 patients (48.4%) with TUR alone, a decrease of 39% in the odds of recurrence with chemotherapy (OR 0.61, p <0.0001). Patients with a single tumor (OR 0.61) and those with multiple tumors (OR 0.44) benefited. However, after 1 instillation 65.2% of patients with multiple tumors had recurrence compared to 35.8% of patients with single tumors, showing that 1 instillation alone is insufficient treatment for patients with multiple tumors. CONCLUSIONS: One immediate intravesical instillation of chemotherapy significantly decreases the risk of recurrence after TUR in patients with stage Ta T1 single and multiple bladder cancer. It is the treatment of choice in patients with a single, low risk papillary tumor and is recommended as the initial treatment after TUR in patients with higher risk tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Capoun, O., Cohen, D., Compérat, E. M., Dominguez Escrig, J. L., Gontero, P., Liedberg, F., Masson-Lecomte, A., Mostafid, A. H., et al. (2022) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010 · Cited by 1,615
Self-citationEAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Zigeuner, R., Shariat, S. F., van Rhijn, B. W. G., Compérat, E., Sylvester, R. J., Kaasinen, E., Böhle, A., Palou Redorta, J., et al. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationKaufman, D. S., Shipley, W. U., & Feldman, A. S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60491-8 · Cited by 988
Hall, M. C., Chang, S. S., Dalbagni, G., Pruthi, R. S., Seigne, J. D., Skinner, E. C., Wolf, J. S., & Schellhammer, P. F. (2007) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003 · Cited by 830
Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?
Sievert, K. D., Amend, B., Nagele, U., Schilling, D., Bedke, J., Horstmann, M., Hennenlotter, J., Kruck, S., & Stenzl, A. (2009) · World Journal of Urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-009-0395-z · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- SYLVESTER, R. J., OOSTERLINCK, W., & van der MEIJDEN, A. P. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 6 Part 1
- Pages
- 2186-2190
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2165543889
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A SINGLE IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE INSTILLATION OF CHEMOTHERAPY DECREASES THE RISK OF RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE Ta T1 BLADDER CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000125486.92260.b2
- The paper
- SYLVESTER, R. J., OOSTERLINCK, W., & van der MEIJDEN, A. P. M. (2004). A SINGLE IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE INSTILLATION OF CHEMOTHERAPY DECREASES THE RISK OF RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE Ta T1 BLADDER CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000125486.92260.b2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.