Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CHEMOPREVENTION OF PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN AT HIGH RISK: RATIONALE AND DESIGN OF THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) TRIAL

ANDRIOLE, GERALD, BOSTWICK, DAVID, BRAWLEY, OTIS, GOMELLA, LEONARD, MARBERGER, MICHAEL, TINDALL, DONALD, BREED, SHARON, SOMERVILLE, MATT, RITTMASTER, ROGER, REDUCE STUDY GROUP·2004·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemoprevention may significantly impact the natural history of prostate cancer. The most potent intraprostatic androgen, dihydrotestosterone, has a significant role in the pathophysiology of prostate cancer. It represents a biologically plausible target for chemoprevention through the inhibition of 5alpha-reductase isoenzymes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events clinical trial is an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled chemoprevention study designed to determine if dutasteride 0.5 mg daily decreases the risk of biopsy detectable prostate cancer. A total of 8,000 men will be randomized to receive dutasteride or placebo for 4 years. Eligible men must be 50 to 75 years old, have a serum prostate specific antigen of 2.5 to 10 ng/ml (ages 50 to 60 years) or 3.0 to 10 ng/ml (older than 60 years). Men must have a negative 6 to 12 core biopsy within 6 months prior to enrollment. Repeat biopsies will be taken at 2 and 4 years. The rates of prostate cancer for each treatment group will be compared. Genetic and protein biomarkers of prostate cancer, and the effect of dutasteride on benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis symptomatology and histopathology will also be assessed. RESULTS: Results remain to be determined. CONCLUSIONS: The study will examine the effects of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on the natural history of prostate cancer in men at increased risk for this malignancy. It affords a unique opportunity to examine biomarkers and genetic linkage for prostate cancer, and assess a range of prostate health outcome measures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000139320.78673.2a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
ANDRIOLE, G., BOSTWICK, D., BRAWLEY, O., GOMELLA, L., MARBERGER, M., TINDALL, D., BREED, S., SOMERVILLE, M., RITTMASTER, R., & REDUCE STUDY GROUP
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2004-10
Volume
172
Issue
4 Part 1
Pages
1314-1317
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2066396162
Cited by
291
References
1
FWCI
20.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CHEMOPREVENTION OF PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN AT HIGH RISK: RATIONALE AND DESIGN OF THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) TRIAL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000139320.78673.2a
The paper
ANDRIOLE, G., BOSTWICK, D., BRAWLEY, O., GOMELLA, L., MARBERGER, M., TINDALL, D., BREED, S., SOMERVILLE, M., RITTMASTER, R., & REDUCE STUDY GROUP. (2004). CHEMOPREVENTION OF PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN AT HIGH RISK: RATIONALE AND DESIGN OF THE REDUCTION BY DUTASTERIDE OF PROSTATE CANCER EVENTS (REDUCE) TRIAL. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000139320.78673.2a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.