The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERA IN THE UNITED STATES IS OVER FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS?
Abstract
PURPOSE: We assessed how well preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) reflects the largest cancer in consecutive untreated radical prostatectomies during the last 20 years at Stanford University. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,317 consecutive radical prostatectomies were divided into 4, 5-year periods between August 1983 and July 2003, and examined sequentially in 3 mm step sections by 1 pathologist. The largest cancer and 5 other histological variables in each prostate were measured. Preoperative clinical stages were tabulated for each 5-year period. Means, Pearson correlation coefficients, % change and multiple regression were used to compare selected variables. RESULTS: Most parameters decreased linearly during the 20 years, including palpable nodules on digital rectal examination from 91% to 17%, mean age from 64 to 59 years, mean serum PSA from 25 to 8 ng/ml, and index (largest) cancer volume from 5.3 to 2.4 cc. Percent Gleason grade 4/5 of the largest cancer averaged 27% to 35% and prostate weight 44 to 53 gm. Contrasting August 1983 to December 1988 with January 1999 to July 2003, 6 histological cancer parameters had statistically significant relationships to serum PSA in the first period. In the last 5 years serum PSA was related only to prostate size. CONCLUSIONS: Serum PSA was related to prostate cancer 20 years ago. In the last 5 years serum PSA has only been related to benign prostatic hyperplasia. There is an urgent need for serum markers that reflect the size and grade of this ubiquitous cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: For Whom?
Klotz, L. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.3134 · Cited by 353
Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Schlich, T., & Weisz, G. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.007 · Cited by 258
Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men.
(2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- STAMEY, T. A., CALDWELL, M., McNEAL, J. E., NOLLEY, R., HEMENEZ, M., & DOWNS, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 4 Part 1
- Pages
- 1297-1301
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2103263363
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERA IN THE UNITED STATES IS OVER FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000139993.51181.5d
- The paper
- STAMEY, T. A., CALDWELL, M., McNEAL, J. E., NOLLEY, R., HEMENEZ, M., & DOWNS, J. (2004). THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERA IN THE UNITED STATES IS OVER FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS? Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000139993.51181.5d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.