Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER

CARDOZO, L., LISEC, M., MILLARD, R., van VIERSSEN TRIP, O., KUZMIN, I., DROGENDIJK, T.E., HUANG, M., RIDDER, A.M.·2004·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this phase 3 trial we assessed the efficacy of solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg daily in patients with symptoms related to overactive bladder. In addition, we assessed the safety and acceptability of solifenacin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 12-week once daily treatment with solifenacin 5 mg, solifenacin 10 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline to study end point in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in mean number of urgency, nocturia and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, and mean volume voided per micturition. RESULTS: Compared with changes obtained with placebo (-1.59), micturitions per 24 hours were statistically significantly decreased with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.37, p = 0.0018) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.81, p = 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease was observed in the number of incontinence episodes with both solifenacin doses (5 mg, p = 0.002 and 10 mg, p = 0.016). This effect was also seen for episodes of urge incontinence (5 mg, p = 0.014 and 10 mg, p = 0.042). Of patients reporting incontinence at baseline, fully 50% achieved continence after treatment with solifenacin. Episodes of nocturia were statistically significantly decreased in patients treated with solifenacin 10 mg (-0.71, -38.5%) versus placebo (-0.52, -16.4%, p = 0.036). Episodes of urgency were statistically significantly reduced with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.84, -51%, p = 0.003) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.90, -52%, p = 0.002). Mean volume voided per micturition was statistically significantly increased with both solifenacin doses (p = 0.0001). Treatment with solifenacin was well tolerated. Dry mouth, mostly mild in severity, was reported in 7.7% of patients receiving solifenacin 5 mg and 23% receiving solifenacin 10 mg (vs 2.3% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: In this study treatment with solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg once daily significantly improved all the major symptoms of overactive bladder including frequency, urgency and incontinence. Solifenacin 10 mg also decreased the frequency of nocturia. Solifenacin therapy was associated with a favorable tolerability profile and a low incidence of dry mouth, especially at the 5 mg starting dose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000140729.07840.16

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
CARDOZO, L., LISEC, M., MILLARD, R., van VIERSSEN TRIP, O., KUZMIN, I., DROGENDIJK, T. E., HUANG, M., & RIDDER, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2004-11
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
1919-1924
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2034782018
Cited by
335
References
0
FWCI
32.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000140729.07840.16
The paper
CARDOZO, L., LISEC, M., MILLARD, R., van VIERSSEN TRIP, O., KUZMIN, I., DROGENDIJK, T. E., HUANG, M., & RIDDER, A. M. (2004). RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE ONCE DAILY ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENT SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000140729.07840.16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.