The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE INTRAVESICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined the short-term and long-term efficacy of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed on published results of randomized clinical trials comparing intravesical BCG to intravesical chemotherapy. RESULTS: Nine randomized trials including 700 patients with CIS compared BCG to either mitomycin C (MMC), epirubicin, adriamycin, or sequential MMC/adriamycin. Of 298 patients on BCG 203 (68.1%) had a complete response compared with 158 of 307 patients on chemotherapy (51.5%), a reduction of 47% in the odds of nonresponse on BCG (OR 0.53, p =0.0002). Based on a median followup of 3.6 years, 161 of 345 patients on BCG (46.7%) had no evidence of disease compared with 93 of 355 patients on chemotherapy (26.2%), a reduction of 59% in the odds of treatment failure on BCG (OR 0.41, p <0.0001). Although the long-term benefit of BCG was smaller in trials with MMC, BCG was superior to MMC in trials with maintenance BCG (OR 0.57, p =0.04). The reduction of 26% in the risk of progression on BCG (p =0.20) is consistent with the reduction of 27% (p =0.001) previously reported in a larger superficial bladder cancer meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical BCG significantly reduces the risk of short and long-term treatment failure compared with intravesical chemotherapy. Therefore, it is considered to be the intravesical agent of choice in the treatment of CIS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Capoun, O., Cohen, D., Compérat, E. M., Dominguez Escrig, J. L., Gontero, P., Liedberg, F., Masson-Lecomte, A., Mostafid, A. H., et al. (2022) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010 · Cited by 1,615
Self-citationBabjuk, M., Burger, M., Compérat, E. M., Gontero, P., Mostafid, A. H., Palou, J., van Rhijn, B. W. G., Rouprêt, M., Shariat, S. F., Sylvester, R., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016 · Cited by 1,297
Self-citationEAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013
Babjuk, M., Burger, M., Zigeuner, R., Shariat, S. F., van Rhijn, B. W. G., Compérat, E., Sylvester, R. J., Kaasinen, E., Böhle, A., Palou Redorta, J., et al. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationHall, M. C., Chang, S. S., Dalbagni, G., Pruthi, R. S., Seigne, J. D., Skinner, E. C., Wolf, J. S., & Schellhammer, P. F. (2007) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.003 · Cited by 830
Dougan, M., & Dranoff, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132544 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- SYLVESTER, R. J., van der MEIJDEN, A. P. M., WITJES, J. A., & KURTH, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-91
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2159759416
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE INTRAVESICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000162059.64886.1c
- The paper
- SYLVESTER, R. J., van der MEIJDEN, A. P. M., WITJES, J. A., & KURTH, K. (2005). BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN VERSUS CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE INTRAVESICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE PUBLISHED RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000162059.64886.1c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.