Nasal valve surgery improves disease-specific quality of life
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) assessment of patients with nasal valve compromise and symptomatic nasal obstruction has not been studied previously. The objectives of the study were to determine whether surgical treatment of the nasal valve improves disease-specific QOL and to identify clinical or demographic variables predictive of patients' baseline QOL or change in QOL. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multi-institutional outcomes study of 20 patients with nasal obstruction and a surgically treatable diagnosis of nasal valve compromise. METHODS: Disease-specific QOL assessment was performed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale preoperatively (n = 20) and at 3 (n = 14) and 6 months (n = 20) after surgery. Clinical and demographic data were collected, along with physician-reported assessments of degree of nasal obstruction. RESULTS: Mean NOSE scores significantly improved from baseline to 3 months after surgery (68.9 vs. 20.7 [P < .0001]), from baseline to 6 months after surgery (68.9 vs. 15.8 [P < .0001]), and from 3 to 6 months after surgery (20.7 vs. 15.8 [P = .0077]). Physician assessment of degree of nasal obstruction using a visual analogue scale was significantly correlated with baseline NOSE scores (P = .013) and change in NOSE scores at 6 months (P = .0015). No other clinical or demographic factors were found to be predictive. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic nasal obstruction and nasal valve compromise, surgical repair of the nasal valve improves disease-specific QOL. Physician rating of degree of nasal obstruction was found to be significantly correlated with patient-reported QOL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rhinoresiliography assesses the elasticity and bounce-back capability of the nasal tip concerning the applied force and distance.
“The rhinoresiliography assesses the elasticity and bounce-back capability of the nasal tip concerning the applied force and distance [18].”
From Functional Rhinoplasty. (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 156
- Authors
- Rhee, J. S., Poetker, D. M., Smith, T. L., Bustillo, A., Burzynski, M., & Davis, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rhee, John S.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-440
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060295902
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Keywords
- nasal valve surgery, nasal obstruction, disease-specific quality of life, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, patient-reported outcomes, predictors of quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Nasal Septum, Nose, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Rhinoplasty, Time Factors, Nasal Obstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review