Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pretreatment, Preoperative Swallowing Exercises May Improve Dysphagia Quality of Life

Kulbersh, Brian Daniel, Rosenthal, Eben L., McGrew, Benjamin M., Duncan, Ryan D., McColloch, Nancy L., Carroll, William R., Magnuson, J S.·2006·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives: Dysphagia is commonly associated with head and neck cancer treatment. Traditional dysphagia management strategies focus on post‐treatment therapy. This study evaluated the utility of pretreatment swallowing exercises in improving post‐treatment swallowing quality of life (QOL). Study Design: Prospective cohort study and cross‐sectional QOL analysis. Methods: This study includes 37 patients who underwent primary radiation or combined chemoradiation treatment for newly diagnosed hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, or oropharyngeal primary tumors at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Of the 37, 25 patients underwent swallowing exercises beginning 2 weeks prior to the start of radiation. The M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) was administered an average of 14 months after treatment to assess the success of the protocol. Analysis of QOL scores related to gender, primary site, stage, and race were obtained. Results: Patients who performed pretreatment swallowing exercises (n = 25) showed improvement in the overall MDADI score (P = .0002) compared to the control population (n = 12) who underwent post‐treatment therapy. Furthermore, a separate analysis of individual domains of the MDADI (global, emotional, functional, and physical) demonstrated improved quality of life. Conclusions: Implementation of pretreatment swallowing education and exercise may improve dysphagia‐specific QOL in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation and/or chemoradiation therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000217278.96901.fc

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Kulbersh, B. D., Rosenthal, E. L., McGrew, B. M., Duncan, R. D., McColloch, N. L., Carroll, W. R., & Magnuson, J. S.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
883-886
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2056128626
Cited by
261
References
13
FWCI
24.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pretreatment, Preoperative Swallowing Exercises May Improve Dysphagia Quality of Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.mlg.0000217278.96901.fc
The paper
Kulbersh, B. D., Rosenthal, E. L., McGrew, B. M., Duncan, R. D., McColloch, N. L., Carroll, W. R., & Magnuson, J. S. (2006). Pretreatment, Preoperative Swallowing Exercises May Improve Dysphagia Quality of Life. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000217278.96901.fc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.