Cited by 2Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring

Automated Dispensing Cabinet Overrides Should be Considered Risky, Not Routine

Aschenbrenner, Diane S.·2023·AJN, American Journal of Nursing

Abstract

The safety organization ECRI has listed overriding of safety controls in automated dispensing cabinets as one of the top 10 health technology hazards of 2023.Overrides contribute to medication errors and can harm patients, sometimes fatally. Nurses should only consider using an override in extreme emergencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.naj.0000944908.02445.0f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aschenbrenner, D. S.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Aschenbrenner, Diane S.
Venue
AJN, American Journal of Nursing
Published
2023-07
Volume
123
Issue
7
Pages
17-17
ISSN
0002-936X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381598750
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AJN American Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Keywords
automated dispensing cabinets, medication errors, patient safety, nursing practice, medication administration
MeSH terms
Humans, Medication Errors, Biomedical Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review