The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulation in PhD Programs to Prepare Nurse Scientists as Social Justice Advocates
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Nursing students seeking a PhD often learn only conceptually about principles such as diversity and inclusion, social determinants of health, and interprofessional team science. With only a conceptual understanding of these important elements, future nurse scientists may not fully understand their role as advocates for social justice for vulnerable populations. Students' real-life or hands-on experiences in these areas are often mentor dependent. Simulation in PhD Program is an innovative program to provide these experiences via various modalities, including authentic online activities and in-person experiences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strategies such as community-based service learning, interdisciplinary case-based learning, simulation exercises, and reflective journaling are now seen as essential components of SDOH pedagogy.
“Strategies such as community-based service learning, interdisciplinary case-based learning, simulation exercises, and reflective journaling are now seen as essential components of SDOH pedagogy [56,57].”
From Then, Now, Next: Unpacking the Shifting Trajectory of Social Determinants of Health (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 2012, Social justice: A concept analysis, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68, 948, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05856.x · DOI
- 2016, INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S5
- 2019, Forty years on since Alma Ata: Nursing and social justice, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28, 715
- 2014, Simulation-based interprofessional education guided by Kolb's experiential learning theory, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, 241, 10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004 · DOI
- 2018, Teaching the social determinants of health: A path to equity or a road to nowhere?, Academic Medicine, 93, 25, 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001689 · DOI
- 2017, Emancipatory nursing praxis: A theory of social justice in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science, 40, 223
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Then, Now, Next: Unpacking the Shifting Trajectory of Social Determinants of Health
Wallington, S. F., & Feger, C. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22101541 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenerette, C., Murillo, C. L., Chew, A. Y., & Barksdale, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Venue
- Nursing Education Perspectives
- Published
- 2021-06-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- E60-E62
- ISSN
- 1536-5026 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4685
- OpenAlex
- W3171384469
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Education Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Keywords
- simulation-based education, nurse researchers, social justice advocacy, diversity and inclusion, social determinants of health, vulnerable populations, mentoring
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Learning, Mentors, Physicians, Social Justice, Students, Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
