Cited by 81Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis

Rolak, Loren A., Fleming, John O.·2007·The Neurologist

Abstract

Objective This article will discuss the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), with particular attention to differentiating it from other diseases that can mimic it. Methods We reviewed our own data, as well as the published experience on the differential diagnosis of MS and the most common errors leading to misdiagnosis. Results Psychiatric diseases are mistaken for multiple sclerosis more often than any other conditions. Other multifocal illnesses or white-matter diseases are seldom confused with multiple sclerosis. Conclusion Neurologists are most likely to misdiagnose multiple sclerosis in patients who have psychiatric problems or who have uncommon presentations of common diseases such as migraine, stroke, or neuropathies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nrl.0000254705.39956.34

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an American tertiary MS center from 2004 to 2007, the most common diagnosis was 'psychiatric disease' in 53 out of 70 (76%) patients who had been referred for MS evaluation but did not have MS.

    “In an American tertiary MS center from 2004 to 2007, the most common diagnosis was “psychiatric disease” in 53 out of 70 (76%) patients who had been referred for MS evaluation but did not have MS [24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolak, L. A., & Fleming, J. O.
Affiliations
  • Marshfield Clinic (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Rolak, Loren A.
Venue
The Neurologist
Published
2007-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
57-72
ISSN
1074-7931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136221887
Cited by
81
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Neurologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, differential diagnosis, misdiagnosis, mental illness, white matter disease, migraine, stroke, neuropathy, atypical presentation
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Central Nervous System, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Encephalitis, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Physician-Patient Relations, Predictive Value of Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review