The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adjustable Gastric Banding and Conventional Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Several observational studies suggest that bariatric surgery leading to sustained weight loss confers substantial benefit on obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, but no randomized controlled trials have been reported. This unblinded randomized controlled trial enrolled 60 obese persons 20 to 60 years of age who had a body mass index above 30 but less than 40. Type 2 diabetes had been clearly documented within the past 2 years. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, while 30 others received conventional treatment for diabetes focusing on weight loss through lifestyle changes. Remission of diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose level below 126 mg/dL and a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value below 6.2% without glycemic medication. After 2 years, type 2 diabetes had remitted in 43% of patients randomized to have surgery and in 13% of those treated conventionally. The respective remission rates among those completing the study were 76% and 15%. The relative risk of remission for the surgical group was 5.5, with a 95% confidence interval of 2.2–14.0. The surgical and control groups had lost a mean of 21% and 2% of body weight, respectively, after 2 years. Remission correlated independently with a greater percentage weight loss at 2 years and with a lower baseline HbA1c value. Only 12% of patients who lost less than 10% of body weight were in remission at 2 years. Weight loss correlated positively with the frequency of planned physical activity. In surgical patients, mean levels of both HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than in conventionally treated patients. Surgical patients used significantly less pharmacotherapy for glycemic control. No serious complications were noted in either group of patients. Although larger and longer-term studies are needed, these findings strongly support the view that surgically induced weight loss be considered at an early stage for obese patients who have type 2 diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gloy, V. L., Briel, M., Bhatt, D. L., Kashyap, S. R., Schauer, P. R., Mingrone, G., Bucher, H. C., & Nordmann, A. J. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f5934 · Cited by 1,351
Picot, J., Jones, J., Colquitt, J., Gospodarevskaya, E., Loveman, E., Baxter, L., & Clegg, A. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13410 · Cited by 1,066
Courcoulas, A. P. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280928 · Cited by 799
Goodpaster, B. H., DeLany, J. P., Otto, A. D., Kuller, L., Vockley, J., South-Paul, J. E., Thomas, S. B., Brown, J., McTigue, K., Hames, K. C., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1505 · Cited by 558
Courcoulas, A. P., Belle, S. H., Neiberg, R. H., Pierson, S. K., Eagleton, J. K., Kalarchian, M. A., DeLany, J. P., Lang, W., & Jakicic, J. M. (2015) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1534 · Cited by 376
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, J. B., O'Brien, P. E., Playfair, J., Chapman, L., Schachter, L. M., Skinner, S., Proietto, J., Bailey, M., & Anderson, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 372-373
- ISSN
- 0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978168647
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjustable Gastric Banding and Conventional Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ogx.0000314848.71777.69
- The paper
- Dixon, J. B., O'Brien, P. E., Playfair, J., Chapman, L., Schachter, L. M., Skinner, S., Proietto, J., Bailey, M., & Anderson, M. (2008). Adjustable Gastric Banding and Conventional Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000314848.71777.69
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.