Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability

de Ligt, Joep, Willemsen, Marjolein H., van Bon, Bregje W. M., Kleefstra, Tjitske, Yntema, Helger G., Kroes, Thessa, Vulto-van Silfhout, Anneke T., Koolen, David A., de Vries, Petra, Gilissen, Christian, del Rosario, Marisol, Hoischen, Alexander, Scheffer, Hans, de Vries, Bert B. A., Brunner, Han G., Veltman, Joris A., Vissers, Lisenka E. L. M.·2013·Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey

Abstract

Severe intellectual disability (IQ <50) affects about 0.5% of the population in Western countries and carries a high health burden. In developed countries, most severe forms of intellectual disability are thought to have a genetic cause, but the cause is still unknown in 55% to 60% of patients. A diagnosis and understanding of a genetic cause may offer information on the prognosis, preclude further unnecessary invasive testing, and lead to appropriate access to medical and supportive care. De novo point mutations in more than 1000 different genes may cause intellectual disability. This study was undertaken to assess the role of de novo as well as X-linked and autosomal recessive inherited mutations in 100 patients with unexplained intellectual disability, using a family-based exome-sequencing approach. These individuals had prior extensive clinical and genetic evaluation, but no definitive etiologic diagnosis was possible. They had exhausted current diagnostic strategies, a common situation for patients with severe intellectual disability. The 53 female and 47 male patients had unexplained severe intellectual disability. Forty-one patients were 10 to 20 years old, 37 were younger than 10 year, and 22 were older than 20 years. Patients had undergone genomic profiling and targeted gene tests, with metabolic screening if needed, but no etiologic diagnosis was possible. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood, and exomes were enriched. Possible de novo mutations were selected by excluding variants inherited from either parent, and candidate recessive and X-linked mutations were selected by segregation analysis. Candidate de novo mutations were validated by conventional Sanger sequencing methods in DNA samples. High-throughput resequencing was used to confirm new candidate genes in 765 individuals with intellectual disability. Mutations were classified based on 7 factors: function of the affected gene, effect of the mutation on the codon, in silico prediction of the functional effect at the amino acid level, evolutionary conservation, brain expression patterns, analysis of gene ontology terms, and use of animal models. An average of 24,324 genetic variants were detected per patient. The automated prioritization scheme identified 690 candidate de novo mutations (average number per patient, 7; range, 2–20). Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of 79 de novo mutations affecting 77 genes in 53 patients (range per patient, 1–4). Conclusive genetic diagnoses were obtained for 10 patients with de novo mutations in known intellectual disability genes and for 3 male patients with severely disruptive, maternally inherited mutations in known X-linked intellectual disability genes. No diagnostically relevant, inherited autosomal recessive mutations were identified. A diagnostic yield of 13% was obtained from mutations in known intellectual disability genes. Twenty-four novel candidate genes affected by de novo mutations were identified. DYNC1H1, GATAD2B, and CTNNB1 are novel intellectual disability genes, which raised the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing to 16%. Exome sequencing can be used as a diagnostic procedure for patients with severe intellectual disability of unknown cause. The diagnostic yield of 16% may increase as methods improve to identify other genes associated with intellectual disability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ogx.0000428160.59063.a6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
de Ligt, J., Willemsen, M. H., van Bon, B. W. M., Kleefstra, T., Yntema, H. G., Kroes, T., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Koolen, D. A., de Vries, P., Gilissen, C., del Rosario, M., Hoischen, A., Scheffer, H., de Vries, B. B. A., Brunner, H. G., Veltman, J. A., & Vissers, L. E. L. M.
Venue
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Published
2013-03
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
191-193
ISSN
0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314905147
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
37.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ogx.0000428160.59063.a6
The paper
de Ligt, J., Willemsen, M. H., van Bon, B. W. M., Kleefstra, T., Yntema, H. G., Kroes, T., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Koolen, D. A., de Vries, P., Gilissen, C., del Rosario, M., Hoischen, A., Scheffer, H., de Vries, B. B. A., Brunner, H. G., Veltman, J. A., & Vissers, L. E. L. M. (2013). Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000428160.59063.a6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.