The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability
Abstract
Severe intellectual disability (IQ <50) affects about 0.5% of the population in Western countries and carries a high health burden. In developed countries, most severe forms of intellectual disability are thought to have a genetic cause, but the cause is still unknown in 55% to 60% of patients. A diagnosis and understanding of a genetic cause may offer information on the prognosis, preclude further unnecessary invasive testing, and lead to appropriate access to medical and supportive care. De novo point mutations in more than 1000 different genes may cause intellectual disability. This study was undertaken to assess the role of de novo as well as X-linked and autosomal recessive inherited mutations in 100 patients with unexplained intellectual disability, using a family-based exome-sequencing approach. These individuals had prior extensive clinical and genetic evaluation, but no definitive etiologic diagnosis was possible. They had exhausted current diagnostic strategies, a common situation for patients with severe intellectual disability. The 53 female and 47 male patients had unexplained severe intellectual disability. Forty-one patients were 10 to 20 years old, 37 were younger than 10 year, and 22 were older than 20 years. Patients had undergone genomic profiling and targeted gene tests, with metabolic screening if needed, but no etiologic diagnosis was possible. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood, and exomes were enriched. Possible de novo mutations were selected by excluding variants inherited from either parent, and candidate recessive and X-linked mutations were selected by segregation analysis. Candidate de novo mutations were validated by conventional Sanger sequencing methods in DNA samples. High-throughput resequencing was used to confirm new candidate genes in 765 individuals with intellectual disability. Mutations were classified based on 7 factors: function of the affected gene, effect of the mutation on the codon, in silico prediction of the functional effect at the amino acid level, evolutionary conservation, brain expression patterns, analysis of gene ontology terms, and use of animal models. An average of 24,324 genetic variants were detected per patient. The automated prioritization scheme identified 690 candidate de novo mutations (average number per patient, 7; range, 2–20). Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of 79 de novo mutations affecting 77 genes in 53 patients (range per patient, 1–4). Conclusive genetic diagnoses were obtained for 10 patients with de novo mutations in known intellectual disability genes and for 3 male patients with severely disruptive, maternally inherited mutations in known X-linked intellectual disability genes. No diagnostically relevant, inherited autosomal recessive mutations were identified. A diagnostic yield of 13% was obtained from mutations in known intellectual disability genes. Twenty-four novel candidate genes affected by de novo mutations were identified. DYNC1H1, GATAD2B, and CTNNB1 are novel intellectual disability genes, which raised the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing to 16%. Exome sequencing can be used as a diagnostic procedure for patients with severe intellectual disability of unknown cause. The diagnostic yield of 16% may increase as methods improve to identify other genes associated with intellectual disability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants
Kircher, M., Witten, D. M., Jain, P., O'Roak, B. J., Cooper, G. M., & Shendure, J. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2892 · Cited by 6,183
A polygenic burden of rare disruptive mutations in schizophrenia
Purcell, S. M., Moran, J. L., Fromer, M., Ruderfer, D., Solovieff, N., Roussos, P., O’Dushlaine, C., Chambert, K., Bergen, S. E., Kähler, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12975 · Cited by 1,385
Molecular Findings Among Patients Referred for Clinical Whole-Exome Sequencing
Yang, Y., Muzny, D. M., Xia, F., Niu, Z., Person, R., Ding, Y., Ward, P., Braxton, A., Wang, M., Buhay, C., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.14601 · Cited by 1,360
Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease
MacArthur, D. G., Manolio, T. A., Dimmock, D. P., Rehm, H. L., Shendure, J., Abecasis, G. R., Adams, D. R., Altman, R. B., Antonarakis, S. E., Ashley, E. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13127 · Cited by 1,224
Convergence of genes and cellular pathways dysregulated in autism spectrum disorders
Pinto, D., Delaby, E., Merico, D., Barbosa, M., Merikangas, A., Klei, L., Thiruvahindrapuram, B., Xu, X., Ziman, R., Wang, Z., et al. (2014) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.03.018 · Cited by 969
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ligt, J., Willemsen, M. H., van Bon, B. W. M., Kleefstra, T., Yntema, H. G., Kroes, T., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Koolen, D. A., de Vries, P., Gilissen, C., del Rosario, M., Hoischen, A., Scheffer, H., de Vries, B. B. A., Brunner, H. G., Veltman, J. A., & Vissers, L. E. L. M.
- Venue
- Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-193
- ISSN
- 0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314905147
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ogx.0000428160.59063.a6
- The paper
- de Ligt, J., Willemsen, M. H., van Bon, B. W. M., Kleefstra, T., Yntema, H. G., Kroes, T., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Koolen, D. A., de Vries, P., Gilissen, C., del Rosario, M., Hoischen, A., Scheffer, H., de Vries, B. B. A., Brunner, H. G., Veltman, J. A., & Vissers, L. E. L. M. (2013). Diagnostic Exome Sequencing in Persons With Severe Intellectual Disability. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000428160.59063.a6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.