The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation Between Genetic Alterations and Microscopic Features, Clinical Manifestations, and Prognostic Characteristics of Thyroid Papillary Carcinomas
Abstract
Papillary carcinoma is the most common type of thyroid malignancy. It has been recently shown that these tumors commonly have one of three genetic alterations: BRAF point mutations, RET/PTC rearrangements, or RAS point mutations. In this study, we analyze the relationship between these alterations and the microscopic features of papillary carcinomas, their clinical features, and prognostic characteristics. Ninety-seven papillary carcinomas were studied; in all cases, frozen tissue was available for nucleic acid extraction. Of 96 unselected cases, 42% were positive for BRAF, 18% for RET/PTC, and 15% for RAS mutations. Morphologic features were evaluated in detail in 61 cases and 6 characteristic nuclear features and 3 additional microscopic features were assessed quantitatively. At least 4 nuclear features were found in each tumor, with nuclear pseudoinclusions being the least frequent finding in all mutation groups. BRAF mutations were associated with older patient age, typical papillary appearance or the tall cell variant, a higher rate of extrathyroidal extension, and more advanced tumor stage at presentation. RET/PTC rearrangements presented at younger age and had predominantly typical papillary histology, frequent psammoma bodies, and a high rate of lymph node metastases. Tumors with RAS mutations were exclusively the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma and correlated with significantly less prominent nuclear features and low rate of lymph node metastases. These findings demonstrate that BRAF, RET/PTC, and RAS mutations are associated with distinct microscopic, clinical, and biologic features of thyroid papillary carcinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer
Nikiforov, Y. E., & Nikiforova, M. N. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.142 · Cited by 1,011
Self-citationXing, M. (2007) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2007-0007 · Cited by 983
Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel (ThyroSeq) for Detection of Mutations in Thyroid Cancer
Nikiforova, M. N., Wald, A. I., Roy, S., Durso, M. B., & Nikiforov, Y. E. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2292 · Cited by 485
Self-citationKim, T. H., Park, Y. J., Lim, J. A., Ahn, H. Y., Lee, E. K., Lee, Y. J., Kim, K. W., Hahn, S. K., Youn, Y. K., Kim, K. H., et al. (2012) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.26500 · Cited by 400
Rivera, M., Ricarte-Filho, J., Knauf, J., Shaha, A., Tuttle, M., Fagin, J. A., & Ghossein, R. A. (2010) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.112 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Adeniran, A. J., Zhu, Z., Gandhi, M., Steward, D. L., Fidler, J. P., Giordano, T. J., Biddinger, P. W., & Nikiforov, Y. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-222
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045020328
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation Between Genetic Alterations and Microscopic Features, Clinical Manifestations, and Prognostic Characteristics of Thyroid Papillary Carcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.pas.0000176432.73455.1b
- The paper
- Adeniran, A. J., Zhu, Z., Gandhi, M., Steward, D. L., Fidler, J. P., Giordano, T. J., Biddinger, P. W., & Nikiforov, Y. E. (2006). Correlation Between Genetic Alterations and Microscopic Features, Clinical Manifestations, and Prognostic Characteristics of Thyroid Papillary Carcinomas. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000176432.73455.1b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.