The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Corticosteroid Treatment and Functional Improvement in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Long-Term Effect
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the long-term effects of prednisone and deflazacort on the functional status of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. DESIGN: A total of 49 boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, between the age of 12 and 15 yrs, who were observed over a 7-yr period were reviewed retrospectively. Eighteen had been treated with prednisone, 12 with deflazacort, and 19 had no drug treatment. All boys treated with steroids received medication for >2 yrs before losing their ambulation. Lower and upper limb motor functions, pulmonary function, prevalence of surgery for scoliosis, and side effects were compared. RESULTS: Boys in the steroid groups were significantly more functional and performed better on all tests than boys not treated (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the deflazacort- and prednisone-treated groups (P > 0.05). The number of boys having scoliosis surgery in treated groups was significantly less than nontreated boys (P < 0.05). The control group's pulmonary capacity was decreasing and significantly less than both prednisone- and deflazacort-treated boys. Both deflazacort and prednisone had beneficial effect on pulmonary function and scoliosis. Cataracts, hypertension, behavioral changes, excessive weight gain, and vertebral fracture were noted as serious side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisone and deflazacort have a significant beneficial effect on slowing the disease progress. Their usage in Duchenne muscular dystrophy may prolong ambulation and upper limb function with similar potency. Both steroids also improve pulmonary function, in addition to delaying the need for spinal interventions, with similar therapeutic profiles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bushby, K., Finkel, R., Birnkrant, D. J., Case, L. E., Clemens, P. R., Cripe, L., Kaul, A., Kinnett, K., McDonald, C., Pandya, S., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70271-6 · Cited by 2,053
Evidence-based path to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Mendell, J. R., Shilling, C., Leslie, N. D., Flanigan, K. M., al‐Dahhak, R., Gastier‐Foster, J., Kneile, K., Dunn, D. M., Duval, B., Aoyagi, A., et al. (2012) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.23528 · Cited by 813
Corticosteroids for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Matthews, E., Brassington, R., Kuntzer, T., Jichi, F., & Manzur, A. Y. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003725.pub4 · Cited by 493
Yiu, E. M., & Kornberg, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health · doi:10.1111/jpc.12868 · Cited by 335
Gloss, D., Moxley, R. T., Ashwal, S., & Oskoui, M. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002337 · Cited by 258
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Balaban, B., Matthews, D. J., Clayton, G. H., & Carry, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 843-850
- ISSN
- 0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072075432
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticosteroid Treatment and Functional Improvement in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Long-Term Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.phm.0000184156.98671.d0
- The paper
- Balaban, B., Matthews, D. J., Clayton, G. H., & Carry, T. (2005). Corticosteroid Treatment and Functional Improvement in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Long-Term Effect. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000184156.98671.d0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.