The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classification and Management of Gynecomastia: Defining the Role of Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction
Abstract
Gynecomastia, or excessive male breast development, has an incidence of 32 to 65 percent in the male population. This condition has important physical and psychological impacts. Advances in elucidating the pathophysiology of gynecomastia have been made, though understanding remains limited. Recommendations for evaluation and workup have varied and are often arbitrary. A diagnostic algorithm is suggested, with emphasis on a comprehensive history, physical examination, and minimizing unnecessary diagnostic testing. Medical management has had limited success; surgical therapy, primarily through excisional techniques, has been the accepted standard. Although effective, excisional techniques subject patients to large, visible scars. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction has recently emerged as a safe and effective method for the treatment of gynecomastia. It is particularly efficient in the removal of the dense, fibrous male breast tissue while offering advantages in minimal external scarring. A new system of classification and graduated treatment is proposed, based on glandular versus fibrous hypertrophy and degree of breast ptosis (skin excess). The authors' series of 61 patients with gynecomastia from 1987 to 2000 at the University of Texas Southwestern Department of Plastic Surgery demonstrated an overall success rate of 86.9 percent using suction-assisted lipectomy (1987 to 1997) and ultrasound-assisted liposuction (1997 to 2000). The authors have found ultrasound-assisted liposuction to be effective in treating most grades of gynecomastia. Excisional techniques are reserved for severe gynecomastia with significant skin excess after attempted ultrasound-assisted liposuction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Braunstein, G. D. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp070677 · Cited by 425
Nordenström, A., Ahmed, S. F., van den Akker, E., Blair, J., Bonomi, M., Brachet, C., Broersen, L. H. A., Claahsen-van der Grinten, H. L., Dessens, A. B., Gawlik, A., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-22-0073 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrich, R. J., Ha, R. Y., Kenkel, J. M., & Adams, W. P.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 909-923
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087820961
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification and Management of Gynecomastia: Defining the Role of Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.prs.0000042146.40379.25
- The paper
- Rohrich, R. J., Ha, R. Y., Kenkel, J. M., & Adams, W. P. (2003). Classification and Management of Gynecomastia: Defining the Role of Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000042146.40379.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.