Cited by 213Cancer survivorship and careCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseCardiac Health and Mental Health

Psychological Distress and Cancer Survival: A Follow-Up 10 Years After Diagnosis

Brown, Kirk W., Levy, Adrian R., Rosberger, Zeev, Edgar, Linda·2003·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study tested the predictive role of psychological distress in cancer survival, while attempting to overcome several important methodological and statistical limitations that have clouded the issue. METHODS: Measures collected on a range of emotional and cognitive factors in the early postdiagnostic period and at 4-month intervals up to 15 months after diagnosis were used to predict survival time up to 10 years among 205 cancer patients heterogeneous in disease site, status, and progression. RESULTS: With the use of both baseline and repeated measures, depressive symptomology was the most consistent psychological predictor of shortened survival time, after controlling for several known demographic and medical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Given the importance of depressive symptoms to cancer survival, discussion focuses on the possible mechanisms mediating this relationship, the importance of psychological screening of cancer patients, and need for further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000077503.96903.a6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distress in cancer patients has been associated with non-adherence to anti-cancer medications; increased number of clinic and emergency room visits, longer hospital stays; worse quality of life and inferior survival.

    “Distress in cancer patients has been associated with non-adherence to anti-cancer medications; increased number of clinic and emergency room visits, longer hospital stays [55, 56]; worse quality of life and inferior survival [57–59].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 213

Authors
Brown, K. W., Levy, A. R., Rosberger, Z., & Edgar, L.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2003-07
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
636-643
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089437545
Cited by
213
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
psychological distress, cancer survival, depressive symptoms, depression, prognostic factors, psychological screening, cancer patients, repeated measures
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Single-Blind Method, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review