The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparative Phase III Trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem, a novel beta-lactam agent with wide activity against common pathogens encountered in intraabdominal infection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Ertapenem has a pharmacokinetic profile and antimicrobial spectrum that support the potential for use as a once-a-day agent for the treatment of common mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. METHODS This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam as therapy following adequate surgical management of complicated intraabdominal infections. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-three patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, with 396 meeting all criteria for the evaluable population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was most common (approximately 60% in microbiologically evaluable population). A prospective, expert panel review was conducted to assess the adequacy of surgical source control in patients who were failures as a component of evaluability. For the modified intent-to-treat groups, 245 of 311 patients treated with ertapenem (79.3%) were cured, as were 232 of 304 (76.2) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. One hundred seventy-six of 203 microbiologically evaluable patients treated with ertapenem (86.7%) were cured, as were 157 of the 193 (81.2%) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g once a day was equivalent to piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hours in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety and tolerability profile to piperacillin/tazobactam. A formal process for review of adequacy of source control was found to be of benefit. The results of this trial suggest that ertapenem may be a useful option that could eliminate the need for combination and/or multidosed antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of intraabdominal infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection
Mazuski, J. E., Tessier, J. M., May, A. K., Sawyer, R. G., Nadler, E. P., Rosengart, M. R., Chang, P. K., O'Neill, P. J., Mollen, K. P., Huston, J. M., et al. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2016.261 · Cited by 573
Mazuski, J. E., Sawyer, R. G., Nathens, A. B., DiPiro, J. T., Schein, M., Kudsk, K. A., & Yowler, C. (2002) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/109629602761624180 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Solomkin, J. S., Yellin, A. E., Rotstein, O. D., Christou, N. V., Dellinger, E. P., Tellado, J. M., Malafaia, O., Fernandez, A., Choe, K. A., Carides, A., Satishchandran, V., & Teppler, H.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 237
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-245
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967549517
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparative Phase III Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000048551.32606.73
- The paper
- Solomkin, J. S., Yellin, A. E., Rotstein, O. D., Christou, N. V., Dellinger, E. P., Tellado, J. M., Malafaia, O., Fernandez, A., Choe, K. A., Carides, A., Satishchandran, V., & Teppler, H. (2003). Ertapenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Comparative Phase III Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000048551.32606.73
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
